Dismissed

Sultan Ul Uloom Education Society and 2 others v. The Pharmacy Council of India,and another

Telangana HC9 Sept 2024WP/4325/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Educational institutions challenged notifications increasing Pharmacy Education Regulatory Charges levied by the Pharmacy Council of India for B.Pharm, Pharm.D and M.Pharm courses. The writ petition was withdrawn at the request of the petitioner's counsel and dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sultan Ul Uloom Education Society and 2 others Vs… — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32s6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

MONDAY ,THE^{NINTHDAYOF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY FOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE C.V.BHASKARREDDY}

¶6

WRIT PETITION^N O:43^{25 0F 2023}

¶7

Between:

¶8

l.SultanUlUloomEducationSocietyand2others,MountPleasant,S-2-249.1o' Idz, ii"ro rl". l, a";]jii;'Hi||i, Hlio"riuio, 500034 Rep bv its secretary Mr' Zafar Javeed

¶9

2.sultanUlUloomCollegeofPharmacy,MountPleasant'8-2;249-to267'Road

¶10

2.sultanUlUloomCollegeofPharmacy,MountPleasant'8-2;249-to267'Road - tl6la, e;njrii uitts, HVo".uJo' soo6aa Rep' bv its secretary Mr' zafar Javeed

¶11

S ffi.7rfrt^{Javeed'S/o Late Syed Mohd AmjadAli Khan' Aged 64 years'R/o} Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad. ...'ET'T'ONERS

¶12

...'ET'T'ONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

l.ThePharmacyCounciloflndia,andanother,NBCCCentre'3rdFloor'Plot' N;: i,'c6rr,jniird"ii';; M;-; A;;d'ai rvtars, okhla' Phase -1' New Delhi' 11OO2O ReP.^{bY its Reqistrar'}

¶15

Union of^{lndia, n"p'"oVli.s"cretary, Ministryof Health and Familywelfare,} New Delhi

¶16

"'RESP.NDENT'

¶17

Petition under^{Article 226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtoissueanyappropriatewrit'orderordirectionmoreparticularlyonein thenatureofwritofMandamus,i)DeclaringtheactionofthelstRespondentin issuing the notifications^{dated02102t2o23andoBt02t2o23 for the Academic Year} 2023-24, to the^{extent of increasingthe PharmacyEducationRegulatory} ChargestobepaidbythePetitionerlnstitutionsforthecoursesofBachelorof Pharmacy^{(B Pharm), Doctor of Pharmacy(Pharm'D)' and [Vlasterof Pharmacy} (M.Pharm),asarbitrary,illegalandunconstitutional'andsetasidethesameii) Declaring the^{action of the 1st Respondentto the extent of increasingthe} Pharmacy Education^{Regulatory Charges for the coursesof Bachelorof} Pharmacy^{(8. Pharm), Doctor of Pharmacy(Pharm D)' and Master of Pharmacy} (M. Pharm), vide^{notification bearing ltem' No' 709 of 02 366/EC(25l26June'}

¶18

2022), F No. 14-43112022-PCl.^{14-5612022(Review of SIF) (A), as arbitrary,} illegal and unconstitutional, and set^{aside the sameiii) consequently, direct the} Respondent No. 1 not to^{charge any amounts towards Annual Pharmacy} Education Regulation charges in^{excessof the amounts specified in the} notification dated 04/0^{5/20'1 8}

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶20

Petition under section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition, the HighCourt may be pleased be} pleased to direct the Pt Respondent to take steps to^{consider the applications of} the Petitioner lnstitutions^{for grant of approval for the courseof Bachelor of} Pharmacy^(8. Pharm),^{Doctor of Pharmacy(Pharm. D), and Master of Pharmacy} (M. Pharm), the Academic Year 2023-24^{without referenceto and without} insisting upon^payment of the^{increased Pharmacy EducationRegulatory} charges as specified in the^{notifications dated o2to2l2o23andO8tO2t2O23} pending disposal of the Writ Petition

¶21

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶22

Petition under Section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto} suspend the operation of^{the notificationsdated 0210212023and 0810212023 to} the extent of the increase/additional^{APERCcharges sought to be levied for the} courses of Bachelor of^{Pharmacy (8. Pharm), Doctorof Pharmacy(Pharm. D)'} and Master of Pharmacy^{(M. Pharm), for the AcademicYear 2023-24 pending} disposal of the Writ Petition

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.^{TARUN G. REDDY}

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents:^{SRIGADI PRAVEEN KUMAR} ' DY. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF^INDIA

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI{AR REDDY

¶27

tr RIT PETITION No.4325 of 2o23

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Sri Tarun G. Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Couri to withdraw this writ petition.

¶30

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶31

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

No costs.

¶33

As a sequel, the miscellaneous^{petitionspending,} if^any,

shall stand closed.

/ITRUE COPY//

SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT R ISTRAR SECTI FICER

¶38

To,

¶39

1, one CC to SRI I4EUl.l^{G. REDDY, Advocateto'_Y3,lro*} GENERAL oF i. il; CC io^{SNI. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DY. SOI} rNDrA [OPUCI J Two CD Copies

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:0910912024

ORDER

WP.No.4325 of 2023

lr g-) $31tdSie +
1,<br>.J a' <br>Z4 tz0z t10 vv
)
--) tvrs 3Hl s9

¶48

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS (+ f;Irlr-"r 5c-e;s>

Sultan Ul Uloom Education Society and 2 others v. The Pharmacy Council of India,and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sultan Ul Uloom Education Society and 2 others v. The Pharmacy Council of India,and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangeda Suramma, Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Ranaveni Vanitha Vs Sri. Ramakrishna

Kotagiri Usha Rani Vs Sri. Kasi Reddy

M/ s Skr Constructions Vs The State of Telangana

Fakruddin M.Khambaty Vs Union of India., rep.by its Secretary,Ministry of Railways

Obaid Ur Rehman Vs M. Dana Kishore, IAS