Writ petition challenging an order in I.A. No. 61 of 2016 in O.P. No. 24 of 2016 before the Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad. As the Tribunal had since disposed of the O.P., the Court held no cause survived and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ' -- (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRDDAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITIONNO: 5666 OF 2017
Between:
No.26e), Himavatnnaiir,
...PETITIONERS
AND
7
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to rssue a rvrit order or direction, more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, c;alling the records pertaining to the above case in Op No 2412016 and arsc' IA No.61/2016 and after perusar of the same to kindry pass orders to quash the said order dated- 22.10.2016 in rA No.6.r/2016 0n the grounds stated and in the interest of Justice.
l.A. NO:1 oF 2017twPMP. NO: 6913 OF 20171
Petition under section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant stay against the order Dt. 22.10.2016 passed by the respondent cooperative Tribunar in rA No. 61t2016 in op No. 24t2o16,pending di iposar of the Writ Petition.
Counset for the petitioner: M/s. V.UMA DEVI (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondent No.10: cp FOR COOPERATIVE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I *
7
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.5666 OF2OL7
ORDER:
\
Today, when the matter is taken upfor hearing, none appeared on behalf ofthe petitioners.
3 Recording the submissionmade by learned counsel for the rcspondcntNos. Ito 5 and 9, the Writ Petition is dismissecl as infructuous.There shallbe no order as to costs.
pending, sl-rall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
secrrcri6--rrrcen
To,
BSR
LS9
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2310912024
ORDER
+1 EOf'I
+
sbt
lrot
,+
F
\t\N
ii
3rt+ { of
WP.No.5666 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
@s' ft+"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survived after the underlying O.P. No. 24 of 2016 before the Cooperative Tribunal was disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hindustan Aeronautics Employees Cooperative Housing Society Limited
G. Uma Devi
G. Venkata Rama Raju
Y. Niranjan Murthy
Md. Ramjan Ali
The Chairperson/District Judge, Cooperative Tribunal, at Hyderabad
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
