This High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action did not survive.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous; other miscellaneous petitions pending likewise dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 26029 OF 2018
Between:
Telangana Agricultural Officer's Association, FIat No50'1 ,Block-B, _Skyline Apartment, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Rep.by its Chairman SriB.Krupakar Reddy.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in thenatureof Writ of Ir/IANDAIvIUS declaring the action of the1"t respondenti.e., the State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation(Agr.'l) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep.by its PrincipalSecretaryvideJt/lemo.No.4077lAgri1lA112018' dated 09-07-20'l B in inviting the 3'd respondentassociation, an unrecognized association i.e. the Telangana AgriDoctors Association along with the petitioners association to participate in the counseling of the AOs on 9thand1Orh July, 2018, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposedto law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the memo of the 1"t respondent i.e., the State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation (Agr.1) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep.by its Principal Secretary issued in Memo.No.4077lAgri1lA1 ,2018, dated 09-072018, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3:--
The Couft made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.26O 29 of 2OL8
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneouspetitions, if any pending in this writ
petition, shzr_ll sternd dismissed. No order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY/I
SD/. T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Y
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TJ LS ,,,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2310912024
ORDER
o ( TrrE g l4 I
( t,
wa
I o (('('
I 13 ilrl/ 2lB
P41661:-i:'r
WP.No.26029 of 2018
q. crrS 4-2a f,rko
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
Telangana Agricultural Officer's Association
State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation Department
The Commissioner of Agriculture
Telangana Agri Doctors Association
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
