Writ petition challenging orders closing a second appeal and rejecting an appeal against building permission granted to the sixth respondent. The sole petitioner having expired and legal heirs not pursuing the matter, the High Court dismissed the petition as abated without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE TWENTYFIRST DAYOF SEPTETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
wRIT PETITION NO: 9972 OF 2017
Between:
Gatadi Gundu Gangadhar,son of Narayana, aged 61 years, Occ Business, H'No' 1-3-64t6, Fl/o Zirayatnagar, Armoorvillage and Mandal' NizamabadDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ,order or direction more in the natureof writ of Mandamus Declaringthe a) the order passedby the RespondentNo.2 i.e. District Panchayat officer,Nizamabadvide ProceedingsNo. 85/32212016-(Pts) dated 10- 5-20i 6 closing theSecond Appeal filed by the petitioner statingthat the Respondent No.2 isnot competent authorityto decidethe ownershipof land or title disputes between thepetitioner and the RespondentNo-6 without setting aside orders under appealand b) the order passed by the Respondent No.4 i.e- Sarpanch, Grampanchayat,Perkit KotarmoorvideProceedingsNo. 1412015 dated 16-4-201 5 rejectingthe appeal filed by the petitionerwhich was filed assailing the Buildingpermission granted by the Respondent No.s vide Permit No. 10/,007 dated 22-9-2008in favour of the 6th respondentfor constructionof G.l. sheet roofed room andcompoundwall in my land in Sy.No.461extent 0-6 1/4 situated at Perkit village,Armoor lvlandal,Nizamabad District pursuant to the
t.
to the orderpassed by the Honble High Cou( in Wp No. 20598 of 2009 dated 25-11-i'.014 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to facts and evidence on record and unsustainable in the eye of law and also contrary to the provisions of Ap Panchayat Raj Act 1994 and the Rules made there under and set aside the same
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 12364 OF 2017)
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the Respondent No.6 and his men from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land in Sy.No. 461 extent 0-6 .l /4 situated at Perkit village, Armoor Mandal, Nizamabad District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsr:l for the Petitioner : SRl. V RAVI KIRAN RAO
Counsel forthe Respondents: G NARENDER REDDY, (SC FORTG Zpp_MppGPPS)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ and RURAL DEV (TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
SK,.]
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.9972 OF 2OL7
ORDER:
1 Today when the matter is taken up forhearing, the learned Counsel for thepetitoner wouldsubmit that the sole petitioner expired and thelegal heirs are not pursuing the matter.
abated. No order as to costs.
this Writ Petition shall also stand ciosed.
sDI- F. PADMANABiJA REDDY ASSISTAN REG STRAR ,TRUE COPY/I
Tc SEC-TION OFFICER
(r-
1 1 . Two CD Cooics KS
----.a-
(
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 10912024
ORDER
WP.No.9972 ot 2017
iHE S14
7
,t
1 1 0rc
n24
"d
rr.r 1,6erf F
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Qt lfl-
rt \ cot^r,s
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gatadi Gundu Gangadhar
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department
District Panchayat Officer, Nizamabad
Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nizamabad
Sarpanch, Grampanchayat, Perkit-Kotarmoor Village
Grampanchayat, Perkit-Kotarmoor Village, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary Grade-I
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
