Disposed

Kyasa Aparna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Jan 2024WP/1804/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenged a Gram Panchayat's rejection of a building permission application as arbitrary and without hearing. Without deciding merits, the High Court directed the petitioner to file an statutory appeal under Section 121 of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act within two weeks, with the appellate authority to decide within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; petitioner permitted to appeal under Section 121 Telangana Panchayat Raj Act within two weeks; District Collector to decide within six weeks.

Kyasa Aparna Vs The State of Telangana — Municipal and Town Planning | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁰² I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 1804 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kyasa Aparna, S/o. Kyasa Santosh, Aged 32 years, Occ. Housewife, Fi/o. H.No. 3-43, Near Gram Panchayat Office, Mahammadapoor Village, Husnabad Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶9

AND

¶10

...pETtfloNER

¶11

1 . The Slate of Telangana, Fgp,. Uy its principal Secretary, panchayat Raj _^{g.ep?rtment,Secretariat Buildings, Hyderdbad.Hyderdbad.}

¶12

_^{g.ep?rtment,Secretariat Buildings, Hyderdbad.Hyderdbad.} 2 The District Collector (panchaya't Wino), Siddipet District. 3. r he D.istrict^panchayat Otficer; Siddidi Distriit.

¶13

I he Mahammadaooor Gram panchdyat, Mahammadapoor Village, Husnabad Mandat, Siddioet bistrict R.p _by1;'p;;;;fii 5;.;;irry 5. sri. Kyasa Rakesh. sro. ratd s-jttaiai , nii,. ilr?n"ri,".."j?lapoor vilase, Husnabad Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶14

Petition under Articte 226 of rhe Constiturion of tndia ,rrifr.:ffiIt,ftl: circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ Mandamus decraring the action of 4th respondent in issuing impugned Rejection order dated 02 01'2024' without affording any opportunity to the petitioner as highry i'egar' arbitrary and in vioration of the provisions of panchayat Raj Act and consequenfly set aside the t"" and direct the respondents 2 to 4 to issue Building permission ,rrrrr' :ffi il, ffi :f ;r r*::t{r: :ffi ;ti:.:::: x l;T ; ; District rammadapoor Village, Husnabad Mandal, SiJOip.t A NO: 10F 20 Petition under Section 1S1 CpC the affidavit praylng that in the circumstances staled in filed in support of the petiti on, the High Court may be pleased to direct the direct the respondents 2 to 4 t o issue Building permission pursua nt to

¶15

petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2024 in respect^{of constructionof new} house in House bearing No. 4-3, admeasuring^{140 Sq.yards,situated at} Mahammadapoor Village, Husnabad^lvlandal, Siddipet^{District, pending disposalof} the above Writ Petition

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI^N. JANAROHAN^REDDY

¶17

Counsel for Respondent^{Nos.'lto 3: GP FORPANCHAYATRAJ} RURAL DEVELOPMENT

¶18

counserfor^{RespondentNo.4: sRr R} R$fifiii[ili$ffoot'

¶19

Counsel for^{ResPondent No. 5:} --*

¶20

The Court^{made the following:ORDER}

¶21

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH} WRIT PETITIO^{N No.18O4oF 20.24}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Writ Petition^{is filed seekingthe following} relief:

¶24

"...to issue^{a writ order, or direction more particularlyone in} thenatuleofwritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionof4srespondent i"- i.."i"g^{impugrred Rejectionorder dated02 ol 2024} '^without Jfording Ly^{opp-ortunityto the petitioner as hiShlyillegal' arbitrary} u.,a irr"^{vioiation of the proviiions of PanchayatRaj Act and} Jorr".qr.ntly^{set aside ttre same and direct the respondentNo 2 to 4} ;;-t;;J; euitaing^{Permissionpursuant to petitioner'srepresentation} dated 03.01.2024^{in respecto] constructionof new house in House} ;;;i"s No.4-3, admeasuring^{140 Si:} IT9"'^situatedat t,,I.t -i-.arpoor^{Village,Husnibad Manda-I,Siddipet DisLrict'and} pass..."

¶25

2 Heard learned counsel^{for the petitioner,learned} Government Pleader^{forPanchayatRaj forthe} respondent Nos.1^{to 3 and Sri R' Chandrasekhar} Reddy, learned Standing^{Counsel forGram} Panchayat for the^{respondent No'4'}

¶26

After hearing^{both sides, without going into the} merits of the case,^{the writ petitionis disposedof} directing the^{petitionertoapproach appellate} authority under^{Section l2L of the Telangana} Panchayat Raj Act,^{2OL8 against the impugned}

¶27

¶28

rejection order dated O2.O1.2O24 passed by the respondent No.4 within two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of t.l.is order. After receiving the said appeal filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 is directed to pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible within a period of six (06) weeks thereafter, giving an opportunity to both sides. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

As sequel to it, Miscellaneous petitions, if any

¶30

.t-

¶31

pending, shall stand closed.

¶32

Sd/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT.REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ b/

¶33

SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

The District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Siddipet Diskict.

¶36

The Panchayat Secretary, Mahammadapoor Gram Panchayat, Mahammadapoor Village, Husnabad Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶37

One CC to Sri N Janardhan Reddy Advocate IOPUC]

¶38

Two CCs to GP For Panchayat Raj & Rural Development ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUIj

¶39

One CC to Sri R. Chandrasekhar Reddy, Advocate(OPUC) 6. Two CD Copies

MBC

SK,J

HIGH COURT

DATED :2410112024

1ila s TAt-€
t
e
z
o(.) 2 7 JAll 2021
*
t DEq F e 99

¶45

ORDER

¶46

WP.No.1804 of 2024

¶47

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶48

WITHOUT COSTS

¶49

<br>n,21 .r

Kyasa Aparna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kyasa Aparna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aleti Bheemsen Reddy Vs The Telangana State Election Commission and 2 others

Seetha Lingaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Ramavath Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

S.K.Hashim Vs The State of Telangana

Rgp Properties Pvt.Ltd Vs Gram panchayat, Manikonda Jagir

Sri. Kallu Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others