The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No.4014 of 2013 as withdrawn by the petitioner, RGP Properties Pvt.Ltd, who had challenged demolition actions by respondents without following due process.
Permitted withdrawal of the Writ Petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OFJANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRI T PETITION NO:4014 OF 2013
Between:
RGP Properties Pvt.Ltd, rep.by itsDirectorSmt,AchantaKrishna Veni, Wo.Late'Achanta Bharath Rao,aged 53years, Occ Business,Rl/o.Flat No.403, Prestige towers,HlG-Vl KPHB colony,Ranga Reddy District
...PETITIONER
ANO
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot lheConstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or directionmore in thenature of mandamus declaring the actionof the 1st respondentin tryingto demolishthe constructions made over theplot Nos.15,16,and17 insy.No.120and 128 part to an extent of1 810 sq.yardssituatedatManikondaJagir village,and Grampanchayat, RajendranagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District withoutfollowing the dueprocess of law as beingillegal, and arbitrary,apartfrom being in violation of Arts.14 and 3004 of theConstitutionof lndia besidesthe principles of naturaljustice and consequentlydirect the respondents not to interfere withthe peaceful possession and enjoyment ofmy respectiveplot Nos.15,16and 17 in SY.No.120 and 128part toan extent of 1810 sq.yardswithout following due process of law
l.A. NO: 1 0F 2013IWPMP. NO: 5006 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents his personnel subordinates or any persons on behalf of the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of my respective plot Nos.15,16 and 17 in Sy.No.120 and 128 part to an extent of 1810 sq.yards without following due process of law by demolition pending the disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI G. NARENOER REDDY (sc FoRTG ZPP-MPP-cPPS)
Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRI Y. RAMA RAO(SC FOR HMDA)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.4O14 of 2OL3
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.
dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
petition, shall stand dismissed.
SD/- C. PRAVEENKUMAR ASSISTANT REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To. r '-'1. On" CC to SRl. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI 'Adyoqlq IQ-PUCI i: on; ccto snr. y. RAMARAo(sc EqE t!4D4) Iq?uql 5: on; ca i;SRt. G. NARENDERREDDY,(scFoRrc zPP-MPP-GPPS) toPUCl
HIGH COURT
DATED:2 410112024
1 HE ST4 7e'
e
v
o,JJ 2 |.| ilAF 2024 o
rl
ORDER
WP.No.4O14 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
.P&4 G #Y'd
RGP Properties Pvt.Ltd
Gram Panchayat, Manikonda Jagir
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
