The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw the matter.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTHDAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 42506 OF2016
Between:
Smt. V.Chandrakala, Wo V.Satyanarayana Reddy,Aged 58 years,Occ Household, R/o H. No 4-22, Almaku( Vlllage and Mandal. GadwalDistrict, Gadwal.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petrtion under Arlicle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased tO iSSUe a Writ or order or direction moreparticularlyone in the natureof Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the4th Respondentin rejecting Constructionpermission to thePetitionerin respect of plot to an extentof 560.55 Sq yards in Sy.Nos 384/4 and 384/AAsituated at Bhargavi NagarA Block Atmakur village and Mandal, atpresent Gadwal District, erstwhile Mahaboobnagar District, vide Letter No GPt2112015 dl-1310412015is without authority,unjust, arbitrary, illegal andin violationof the provisions of Gram Panchayat Act and Article 14 and 300-A of the constitution oflndia and Principlesof Natural Justice and consequently to set aside therejection letterNo. GP12112015dl- 1310412015 and direct the 4th Respondent togrant construction permiSslon to the Petitioner forthwith, in the interest ofjustice.
rry- ;-' t
6
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP.NO: 5241 2 0F 2016)
Petitron under section151CPC praying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed insupportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass interim direction to the4th Respondent to consider the application of the Petitioner for constructionpermrssionin respectof plot to an extentof 560.55 Sy yardsin sy.No's 384/4 and 384/AAsituated at BhargaviNagar'A',BlockAtmakur Village and Mandal, GadwalDistrict, erstwhileMahaboobnagarDistrict, pending the above Wflt Petitlonin the rnterestof JUstice
Counsel for thePetitioner: SRI SHAFATH AHMED KHAN CounselfortheRespondentNos'1TO3:GPFORPANCHAYATRAJ&RURAL DEV
Counsel for the RespondentNo.4: SRI G'NARENDER REDDY,SC FORTGZPP- MPP.GPPS
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.425O6 OF 2016
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present Writ
Petition and made endorsement to that effect
withdrawn. No order as to costs
Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANTSGISTRAR
i/TRUE COPY//
SECTfON OFFICER
To
a Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies PSK. O\k
II t
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810912024
ORDER
WP.No.42506 of 2016
-t-:--=:
l\5 S r,i 7 6
<< ( Q
)tl 6(
,.) 1i 0E[ 20Zt "B
I
,.<br>irr/tTaklr9
:-::--j?
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. P+
t3 6 ?cqJ\
re'
-f.i-!r*
,.. 4;xt.-.:it{il.!6d{ft&*ik&i
rr1 }l
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. V. Chandrakala
State of Telangana
District Collector, Gadwal District
District Panchayath Officer, Gadwal District
Grampanchayat Atmakur
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
