Writ petition challenging the allotment of RCC sheds by Agricultural Market Committee was dismissed as infructuous because counsel submitted the cause of action no longer survives.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
i
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUi
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 27643 0F 2015
Between:
T.Shankar Singh, S/o T.Bala Singh, Commission Agent, Shop No.93, Gudimalkapur Market yard, Hyderabad-500 02g, Telangana
AND
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particurarry, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of the respondents in not arotting the 12 0pen RCC sheds near the entrance gate meant for growers of reafy vegetabres, to the growers, as i'egar and arbitrary and to decrare the action of respondents in intending to arrot 12 open RCC srab sheds near the entrance gate to the traders, as illegar' arbitrary and against the Terangana (Agricurturar produce and Livestock), Markets Act and Rules.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 35888 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to allot the'12 open RCC sheds meant for growers of leafy vegetables to the traders who possess traders licence
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. BHARAT BABU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GP FOR AGRICULTURE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Smt. NEERAJA REDDY, SC
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.27643 OF 2015
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the wrir pclir-ion dr>es not survive. In view of the same, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shali
be no order as to costs.
pending, shall stand closecl.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT GISTRAR SECTI ICER
l
To,
s one'Cc to smt.TEERRJA REDDY,sc [oPUC]
BM LS$
HIGH COURT
DATE D : 1 310912024
ORDER
.t:
l ytE ST4 i5
Qx
o
)'7
I 3 0 0E[ 2024
)
-n- "" tr-vlci
WP.No.27643 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCT WITHOUT COSTS
U OUS
.'
K
T.Shankar Singh
The state of Telangana
Commissioner & Director of Agricultural, marketing
Agricultural Market Committee
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
