Disposed

N.Vengal Rao v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Sept 2024WP/14781/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought directions to panchayat authorities to demolish an allegedly illegal construction by respondent 6 in Waddepalli Village. Without going into merits, the court disposed of the petition granting liberty to challenge the house building permission under Section 12(1) of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to challenge the building permission order dated 13.06.2024 before the appropriate authority under Section 12(1) Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018.

N.Vengal Rao Vs State of Telangana — Municipal and Town Planning | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 14781 OF 2024

¶7

Behneen:

¶8

N.Vengal Rao, S/o. Ramchander Rao, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Plot No.U46, Mahadevpuram, Gajularamaram Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, T.S

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

State of Telangana, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Principal Secretary.

¶12

The District Collector, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Hathnoora, Sangareddy District, T.S.

¶14

The Panchayat Secretary, Vaddepalli Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶15

The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Hathnoora, Sangareddy District.

¶16

Rama Rao Dandu, Sio. Rajeshwar Rao, Aged about 52 years, Rl/o. Vaddepally Village, Hathnoora [\rlandal, Sangareddy District, T.S.

¶17

RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents No.4 and 5 in not taking any action against Respondents No.6 as per representations made by the petitioner dated 27.O5.2O24 in the plot admeasuring 200 sq. yds situated at Waddepalli Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents to demolish illegal construction made by the 6th respondent in plot admeasuring 200 sq. yds situated at Waddepalli Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District

¶19

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed implead party Respondent as respondent No 7 in lA and in W.P.No. 1478112024

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.4 and 5 to consider the representations made by the petitioner dated 27.05.2024 and to take necessary action against the 6th Respondent by demolishing the illegal constructions made by the 6th respondent opposite to the house of the petitioner in plot admeasuring 200 sq. yds situated at Waddepalli Village, Hathnoora lvlandal, Sangareddy District, pending disposal of the WP

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. S V RAMANA

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.14781 OF 2024

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of t!;re

¶33

Constitution of India, seeking the following reliel

¶34

"...to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in not taking any action against respondent Nos.6 as per representations made by the petitioner dated 27 .O5.2024 in the plot admeasuring 2OO sq.yds situated at Waddepalli Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 4s and 5d respondents to demolish illegal construction made by the 6h respondent in plot admeasuring 200 sq.yds situated at Waddepalli Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District and pass..."

¶35

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.4, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and perused the entire material on record.

¶36

ln view of the submissions made by both sides and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the House building permission order granted

¶37

to the respondent No.7 uide Proceedings

¶38

SK,J W.P.No.l478 t OF 2024

t t

t I

No.37 /BP/2024, dated 13.06.2024 as^{per Section l2lof} the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018. There shall^be

¶45

no order as to costs.

¶46

+. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall s:and

¶47

closed.

¶48

//TRUE COPY//

¶49

SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTETAR

¶50

SECTIoN oFFIcER

¶51

To,

¶52

One CC to SRl. S V RAMANA^Advocate [OPUCI

¶53

Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT^{RAJRURAL DEV, High Court for the} State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

¶54

Two CD Copies

¶55

One Spare Copy

vl>

CHS

HIGH COURT

DATED:1810912024

ORDER

1H t SrAI{
, -z
f
1l jL J 2[21 a
.'
.lt
,i
-o
c . rnTC*(

¶62

WP.No.14781 of 2024

¶63

CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶64

WITHOUT COSTS ?+

¶65

l2- tr/ 1co1',s5 '

N.Vengal Rao v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Vengal Rao v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karan Patil Vs The State of Telangana

Puli Venkatesham Vs Telangana State Election Commission Represented by its Secretary

T.Shankar Singh, S/o T.Bala Singh, Vs The State of Telangana

R. Gopal Rao, Warangal Dist. Vs Prl. Secy., Coop. Dept. and 3 Ors.

Beesam Narasima Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Smt. v.Chandrakala Vs The State of Telangana