The High Court, Telangana, dismissed a writ petition challenging an election eligibility declaration as infructuous, as the petitioner submitted that the cause of action no longer survives. The petition and incidental matters were closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 4194 OF 2021
Between:
Aleti Bheemsel Bgdly, S/o. Venkata Ramana Reddy, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, F/o. 2-88, Pipri (v), Bazarath Noor (M), Adildbad-District, Telangana.'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in passing proceeding vide Proc. No. 2942lTSEC-Admin/ADB-Bazarhathnoor/2O1g (48) dated 16/01/2021, thereby declaring the petitioner as inel(7ible to contest any election to be held for any office under the provisions of Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2O18 for a period of 3 years frorn the date of issue of the order as illegal unjust in violation of principles of nattral justice and also against Articles 14 and 21 of the Cons{itution of lndia and consequently set aside the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to susPEND the operation of the impugned proceeding vide proc. 2g42trsEcAdmin/ADB-Bazarhathnoor/2019(48) dated 16tO1t2021, passed by the 1st Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt NARApARAJU AVANEESH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p. SUDHEER RAO, STANDING COUNSEL FOR TSEC
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GpSOR paNECfiAyATf,AJ AND
The Court made the fotlowing: ORDER
1
THE HON'BLE SRJ JUSTICEK.SARATH WRIT PETTTION No.4194of 2O2l
ORDER:
Today when the matteris taken up for hearing the learned Counselfor petitioner submits that the cause in lhe presentWrit Petitiondoes not survive and thereby the Writ Petitionhas become infructr.rous'
Writ Petition is dismissedas infructuous.
J As sequel to it, MiscellaneousPetitionspending, if
any, shall stand closed.No order as to costs'
SD/. V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI N OFFICER
To,
MP
GJP
f
HIGH COURT
DATED:2310112024
1H E sTA t€
o
k
q (
.L
oo 15 t4AF 2024 a
-L
+l
t D€S Par ce' cO
ORDER
WP.No.4194 ot 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
b\i'' fb
oaey
Aleti Bheemsel Bgdly
The Telangana State Election Commission
The District Collector
The Returning Officer Cum, Mandal Parishad Development Officer
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
