Disposed

A.K. Ramesh, Secbad v. Commissioner, Ghmc, Hyd and 4 Ot

Telangana HC1 Aug 2024WP/37003/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 37003 of 2012 filed against Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others regarding illegal constructions. The order directs authorities to report on unconducted constructions within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to report on unauthorized constructions within eight weeks; Writ Petition disposed of.

A.K. Ramesh, Secbad Vs Commissioner, Ghmc, Hyd and 4 Ot — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

[³¹⁶⁶ ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 37003 OF 2012

¶8

Between:

¶9

A.K. Ramesh, S/o: late Kannabrran, aged 45 years, Occ Business, R/o H.No.1-11-252149, Motilalnagar, Begumpet, Secunderabad

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bond, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 Gity Planner, Town Planning Circle Vll, Grater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Secunderabad.

¶14

3 Station.House Officer, Chilakalaguda Police Station, Chilakalaguda, Secunderabad.

¶15

4 Kurshuddin, S/o: not known to the petitioner, R/o 12-10-590/99/1/2, New No. 1 282, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

¶16

Shaik Riyaz, S/o: not known to the petitioner, Rlo 12-11-897t1, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

¶17

(Amended es per court order dt: 30-l 1-201 2)

¶18

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue an order or darection more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 herein in not taking any action against the respondents 4 and 5 herein who are making illegal constructions in the lands bearing No. 12-11-52711, Warasiguda, Secunderabad as well as the action of the respondents 1 to 3 herein in not disposing of the representations dt 18-10-2012 and 23-11-2012 as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and for a consequential direction to the respondents^'1 to 3 herein to stop the

¶20

¶21

constructions being made^{by the respondents 4 and 5 herein in municipal No.12-} 1 1 -527 11, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

¶22

l.A. NO:'l OF 2012(WPMP^{. NO: 46950 OF 2012</sup>}

¶23

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased} direct the respondents^{1 to 3 hereinto stop the respondents4 and 5 herein from} proceeding with the construction^{in municipal No. 12-1 1-52711, Warasiguda'} Secunderabad^{pending disposal of the above writ petition}

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI M. V. SURESH}

¶25

Counsel forthe Respondent^{Nos.'tand 2: SRI K. RAVINDER REDDY} (sc FoR GHMC)

¶26

Counsel for the^{Respondent No'3: GPFORHOME}

¶27

Counsel for the^{RespondentNos.4 and 5:--}

¶28

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶29

¶30

the said construction, if found to be unauthorized and also no apptication for regularization is pending, within a period of eight (08) weeks from today by following due process of law.

¶31

Subject to above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶32

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall

¶33

stand closed.

¶34

SD/.A,V.S.PRASAD ASSISTAN REGIS RAR

¶35

//TRUE COPY//

¶36

SECTION OFFICER

¶37

To, 1 The Commissioner,^{Greater Hyderabad lvlunicipal Corporation'Tank Bond'} Hvderabad. 2 it"^pf .t *t. Town Planning^{Circle Vll, Grater Hyderabad Municipal} Coiooration Secunderabad 3 56i-;; H;;";^{ort-ic;;,Chiiakalasuda Police station, chilakalaguda'} Secunderabad. 4 One CC to Sri^{lrrl V. Suresh, Advocate} IOPUCI 5 o; aa i" s,i x. Ravinder^{Reddv (SC foi GHMC)-[OPUC]} . 6 Two CCs to The GP^{for HomeHigh Courtfor the State of lelangana' aI} HyderabadlOPUCl 7. Two CD Copies

TJ GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 10812024

ORDER

WP.No.37003 of 2012

1HE S14
(
(.t' l
oo
2 g r,l[|j 2020
a
t
a

¶45

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETTTION WITHOUT COSTS

¶46

¶47

r1 1_r1 ,
\o

¶48

A.K. Ramesh, Secbad v. Commissioner, Ghmc, Hyd and 4 Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.K. Ramesh, Secbad v. Commissioner, Ghmc, Hyd and 4 Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.V. Subba Rao Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

Shaik Rahman Vs The State of Telangana

Kasubojula Narsaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Annamma Koshy, Vs The State of Telangana

Ankatala Ravinder Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Adapala Sandeep Vs Chevula Janga Reddy