Writ petition challenging a GHMC speaking order directing demolition/conformity of an unauthorised building was withdrawn with liberty to avail other remedies; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs, miscellaneous petitions closed.
Liberty to avail legal remedies granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
wRlT PETITION NO: 20658 OF 2024
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuingthe impugned Speaking Order vide No. 5896/UC/2024; dated 011O71204 bydirecting the petitioners to bring the building in conformity with the sanctionedplan within (15) days from the receipt of this notice failing which further action shatl be taken up by GHMC and the expenses thereon will be recovered fromyou as per the TS-bPASS Act 2020 and GHMC Act,1955, without considering the reply dated 1510712024 of the petitioner keepingpending the reply withoutpassingany orders issued the impugned speaking order is highly iliegal, arbitraryand against theprinciples of naturaljustice and violation of Articles14, 19, 21 and300-A of Constitution of lndia by setting aside the speaking order dated0110712024and consequently direct the respondents not to interfereinto the peaceful possession and enjoyment of thbpetitioners houseprope(y bearing H No.1-1 1012 and1' 3/6/1 , admeasuring 272.5 sq.yards of Survey No..169 situated at Masjid Banda,
Kondapur Village. Serilingampally trrlandal, Ranga Reddy, in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the operation of the Speaking Order passed by the 3rd respondent vide No. 58961UCt2024, dated 01 .07 .2024, pending disposal of the main writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. RAM MURTHY
counser for the Respondent No.1: it_fiffi Hi#l?5l,hl_TrNIsrRArrott AND
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI M.A.K. MUKHEED, SC FOR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
J
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.2O658 of 2024
ORDER:
After making initial submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court towithdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner toavail the remedies open to them in law
J
dismissed as withdrawn. No orderas tocosts.
any, shall stand closed.
SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ ,,, sEcTIOil%FFICER
ctl(
i i
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10812024
.,^\r
.raa ai<br>aa(
:l :)
ll
1 t, iii 2il2[ '. ]J
.:
a't/
<br>l'
' );2
ORDER
WP.No.20658 of 2024
./
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the speaking order dated 01.07.2024 directing the petitioners to bring the building in conformity with the sanctioned plan was sustainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ankatala Ravinder Goud
Smt. A. Lavanya @ A. Vimala
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl Secretary, Municipal Administration Department
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC Circle No. 20, Serilingampally Zone
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
