Petitioners sought writ declarations regarding illegal demolition of their property and directions for departmental inquiries/compensation. Counsel for petitioners sought permission to withdraw the matter, which the Court granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 17202 OF 2024
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ. Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the highhanded action ofRespondent No.3, 4 and 5 in interfering with life and liberty of the Petitionersbesides being peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners property by demolishing the Compound Wall of the Petitioner on 29.06.2024which is situated at Plot No.26C and Part of Plot No.22D in Sy.No.281, 28211,287,288/1situated at Naredmet
Village, Malkajgiri Grama Panchayat, Hyderabad Taluk, within the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Limits and [r/alkajgiri l,4unicipality of MedchalMalkajgiri District by invoking thejurisdiction under Sec405 ofHMCAct, 1955 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust. violative of the Principle of Natural Justiceand violativeof Article 2'1 , 14, 19(1)(e) and 300-4 of the their Constitutionof lndia, consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to 2 conduct necessary DepartmentalEnquiry against thepersons i.e., Respondent No.3 to 4 herein, whowere involvedin demolishing the Petitioners' property and to No. direct total compensation of Rs.11,25,000/- to Petitioners duly reconstructing the Compound Wall
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct order the enquiry with ACB Officials in respect of the Respondent No.5 and 6 for their corruptpractices against the innocentpeople likepetitioners,pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest ofjustice
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to conduct Departmental Enquiry against the Respondent No.3 to 4 herein,,ryhc iveTe involved in Cemolishing the Compound\r'/all of the Petitioners on 29 06 2a24 which is situated at Plot No.26C and Part of Plot No.22D in Sy.No.281 ,28211,2B7,2BBl1 situated at Naredmet Village, li/alkajgiri Grama Panchayat, Hyderabad Taluk, within the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Limits and Malkajgiri Municipality of Medchal-l,4alkajgiri District by invoking thejurisdiction under Sec 405 of HIVIC Act, 1955,pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest ofjustice
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay of all further demolition of scheduled property of the Petitioners in any manner by the Official Respondents herein.pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest ofjustice
lA NO: 4 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 & 6 to remove the construction made by him.. else demolish the illegal construction made by Respondent No. 6
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. S LAKSHMI KANTH
Counsel for the Respondent NO.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
Counsel for the RespondentNOs2 to 4:SRl K.RAVINDER REDDYSC FOR Greater Hyderabad MunicipalCorporation
Counsel for the RespondentNOs.5&6: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLI1 SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAIT
WRIT PETITION No.17202 of 2024
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the
Court to withdrau' the Writ Petition.
withdrawn. No costs.
stand closed.
//TRUECOPY'
sD/- T. JAYASREE / ASSISiANTREGISTRAR /
,i
YH SECTIONOFFICER
To,
5 Two CDCoPies KKS GJP
s
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10812024
ORDER
WP.No.17202 of 2024
I'S r4
/@
,J') ?{ oilt ill (
t'a)
,)+I
so{t
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@crpiai A\r'+"
Annamma Koshy
Thomas Koshy
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Deputy Commissioner
Deputy City Planner
T. VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
