M/S Boodevi Builders Ltd,Hyd v. State of Ap,S.H.O,Rr Dist,Andano
Case brief
What is this about?
Between: M/s Boodevi Builders Limited…
Between: M/s Boodevi Builders Limited…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO :,34832 OF 2011
Between:
M/s Boodevi Builders Limited, having its registered office at D.No.1714, A.c.Guards, Hvderabad.. reo bv its Director, s"ri o.c?ipitikrisr,na neoov, sio'b'n:niiiura [;SSI;':3."44 vears, oc"- :' eusinui;: il,iU ;rri"L'-ii'izi'i', Lc.6irro",
AND
.....PETIT!oNER
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High'coirrt ,ry uu pl93"9q to issue a writ, direction or orders, more particurarry oie in the nature of writ of Mandamus to decrare the action of the 1si respondent in asking tne zna Respondent.to. survey the rands and submit survey Report as tne same"is ittegar, arbitrary and the same is in vioration of Articre 14 ano 300-4 of constitution of lldil .gl^d-.consequentlyset aside the Survey Report date 27.11.2008 in lite No.G/'1433/2008. t.A.NO: 10F 2011 MP.NO:4331 0 0F 2011 I0F 2011 I2011 II
MP.NO:4331 0 0F 2011 I0F 2011 I2011 II
Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the peiition, Inu Higr, court may u" preailo to :'"pgngoperationof proceedingsof rahsirdar, dhamshabao'rra"nciar,-nanga Reddy District, in Lr.No.G/1433/200S dated 2t.1t.ZOOa. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel forthe Respondent No.l : Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Gp FOR REVENUE t he Court made the following ORDER
THE HCIN,BLESRI JUSTTCE K.SARATH WRIT PETITIONNo. 34832 of 20LL
ORDER:
Today, whenthe matter is taken up for hearing' learned counselappearing for the petitioner submits that nofurtheror,der.srequiredtobepassedinthismatterfor further adjudication,tJrereby, the cause inthe writ petition doesnot survlve.
Miscellane ouspetitions, if any, pendingshall stand
closed.
SD/-S.MALLIKARJUNARAO f ASSISTANT REGISTRAR'
\
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To
1- Two CCs to GP Fc)RREVENUE, High Court for the Stateof Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
z. fio-Cds to'OprtrRHOME, High CourtfortheState of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI
a. oire cc to SRIK 'ENUMADHAV, Advocate [oPUc]
SA BSK ?fr-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2311212024
ORDER
WP.No.34832 of 2011
1 gE Sr4I
Lh
i. ) 0 7 flii ?llii az it
.L
l)Esr:a;cSt -).
CLOSING THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
Ot lfr
o^ 5e >{ 8ce{reb
M/s Boodevi Builders Limited
State Of Andhra Pradesh
The Tahsildar & Executive Magistrate, Shamshabad
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court