The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by a civil club challenging proceedings issued for allotting training classes to state education institutions, closing the matter due to complete jurisdictional non-suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 26765 OF 2010
Between
The Civil Club, Yellareddy, Nizamabad District, (Regrd. No.2378/1987) Represented by its General Secretary, L.Ashok Reddy S/o. Durga Reddy R/o.Yellareddy Village and Mandal, Nizamabad Diskict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the.lst Respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings No.C/Estt.lTI/PPPl29l1O, dated 8.10.2010 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and'19 (1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to allot the Petitioners Club to any third party.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 34196 OF 2010)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the impugned proceedings dated 8.10.2010 issued by the 1st respondent, pending final disposal of the writ petition.
,/
l.A. NO: 2 OF 201O(WPM P. NO:37502 OF 20101
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the writpetition,the High Court maybe pleased to permit the petitioner to file the document No.962/09dt. 10.07.2009 issued by the 2nd respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.P RAGHAVENDRAREDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l&2:AGP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3:GP FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
I ,
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.26765 of 2OLO
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for thepetitioner,learned Assistant GovernmentPleaderfor Revenueappearing for the respondents andperused the material on record.
instructions/proceedings issued insuch manner and also the Government ITIhas been already allottedwith vacant, feasible Governmentland in the
2
vicinilr of Yellareddy habitation in Sy.No.14O6 to an
extent of Ac.0S.OO guntas. In view of the same, no cause survives in this matter.
there sha-lI ber no order as to costs.
Writ Petition sha,ll stand closed.
SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI AS T REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
ll /\tt!V SECTION OFFICER
To,
KKS
PSK
k
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011212024
ORDER
ir f HE S14
' oi
+
o
(-) 2 0 FtB ?086
,'i'.i'i i.)
WP.No.26765 of 2010
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (t _-fr to lr-l>" 8Cr"{'i'-r,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has a cause of action given that the Government has not intervened and is using valid Government land for training instead.
The Civil Club, Yellareddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Tahsildar, Yellareddy Mandal, Nizamabad District
The Government ITI College, Yellareddy
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
