The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed in 2011 seeking quashing of revenue orders for non-prosecution. The court noted the absence of petitioner representation at the hearing in December 2024.
None; Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302l
j lI I It
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 33103 OF 201l
Between:
)
(Above 7 to 12 arc R/o 16-3-35/4, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad, A.p.)
All are_ -rep. by their q.P.A. Sri N.B.Ramaiah, S/o Late Sd N.Jaganatham, ?ge{4! y.rs, QccBusiness,Ryo 10-4-38/4, Humayun Nagar, Ma-sabTank, Hyderabad, A.P.
...PETITIONERS
AND
t I
All are Rl/o H.No.7-78, Srinagar Village,Maheshwaram Mandal,R.R.District, A.P. (Since the Conditional Order of the Court dt:1 6-04-20'1 5 has not been tomplied with, the default clause of thesaidorder has beenGiven Effectto, and ihe WP accordingly stands dismissedas against Respondent Nos.3 & 6)
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the natureof writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to theorder dt.06.05.2011 passedby the 1st respondent in Appeal No.F11705/2009,wherebythe order dt.17.12.1988 passed by the 2nd respondent in File No.L/4404/1988, was confirmed andquash the same.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 41134OF 20111
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleased to suspend the order d1.06.05.201 1passed by the 1strespondent inAppeal No.F11705/2009 and the otdet dt.17.12.1988passed by the2nd respondent in File No.L/4404/1988 pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S.SASIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 TO 6: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
IIIRIT PETITION No.331 O3 of2O11 ,
ORDER:
This writ petition is coming for hearing since 2011. On lL.Il.2O24 when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 02-12.2024 under the caption "for dismissal". Today i.e., 09.12.2024, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
SD/.L.LAKSHMIRAO ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To
PSK. BSK
R*-
HIGH COURT DATED:0911212024
ORDER
WP.No.33103 of 2011
.-'' :it: _ --: IirAl
./ ;f (: aar
0:l ii3 2i125
i
)rt, -l'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/DEFAULTWITHOUT COSTS
fl L
n.t
r-(
6c4^a
M/s Sri Venkateshwara Co-operative Farming Society
Bibi Khatoon
K. SARTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
