High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.3285 of 2015 for default as it is the second consecutive date the petitioners were unrepresented, vacating interim orders if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[34051
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special OriginalJurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTHDAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEJUSTICE MOUSHUMIBHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETtTloN NO:3285 F 2015
Between:
...'ET'T'ONERS
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court maybe pleased to issuea writor order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of WRIT OFMANDAMUS, declaringthe action of the respondents 2 and 3 in threateningthe petitionersto publish/displaytheirphotographswithnames and addressesin the News Papers, as illegal'arbitrary'contrary'tothe guidelines issued by the1st respondent and contrary to the provisions of SARFAESIAct and Rules framedthere under and also violativeof Right of privacy guaranteed under Article 19(1) and 21 of Constitutionof lndia and consequentlydirect the respondents2 and 3 to follow the due processof law for recoveryof disputed amountsfromthepetitionersandnottopublishtheirphotographsintheNews Papers.
l.A. NO:'l OF 201s(WPM P. NO i 4362 OF 2015)
Petition under'section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to pubrish/dispray the photographs of the petitioners, their names and addresses in the News Papers and other places, pending disposal of the above Writ petition.
Counsel for thepetitioners: SRI p.SHlV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI N,HAili.lATH Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l & 3: __
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION No.3285 OF 2015
ORDER:
No one appears for the petitioners
Interim orders, if any, shall stald vacated.There shall be no
order as to costs'
sD/- ,'KAVITHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR ,,TRUECOPY" EC to FFICER
" I 3ffi 33I3Rl fr ix'x,,[xffit#3::rta'ffi' 3. TwoCD Copies PSK. PSK lrp' -.Y
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1011212024
ORDER
WP.No.3285 of 2015
f STA r ('eA
(
q
2 7 JI\N 20?5 o>9z
(-)
t
g$ r!
sF ^T
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
@
20- I[as
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Sethi Housing India Pvt Ltd Rep. by Hariinder Singh Sethi
Reserve Bank of India
India Infoline Housing Finance Ltd
M/s G H Global Housing Finance Ltd
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
