Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing a housing finance company to accept repayment of a loan balance and release title deeds. Parties settled the dispute; the petitioner withdrew the writ petition on a memo and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3405 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I-IYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16004 OF 2024
Between:
P.Vidya Sagar, Sir-r P.Dandhayurrr Ageci 7i years, Occupation Reid., Cio P.Swapnika, Sri Sai Anurag New Town, Phase'l , Flat No. 515, 5th Floor, A Block, Thumkunta, 500078.
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the action of the 2nd Respondent in not receiving the balance loan amount of loan Application/ Account No.01261071 from the Petitioner and to liquidate the same, is arbitrary and illegal and Direct the 2nd Respondent to accept the repayment of the balance loan amount by the Petitioner, which is payable by 3rd Respondent herein and on such liquidation of the said loan amount release the title documents to the Petitioner which were deposited under Registered Memorandum of Deposit of title Deeds bearing document No. 334/2016, daled 24.02.2016.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased to direct lhe 2nd Respondent to accept the repayment of the entire balance loan amount by the Petitioner in respect of loan Application/ Account No.01261071 , which is payable by 3rd Respondent herein and on such liquidation of the said loan.amount release the title documents to the petitioner which were deposited under Registered l,4emorandum of Deposit of tifle Deeds bearing document No. 33412016, dated 24.02 2016, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.SHESHU KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : --
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.RAMACHANDRAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI CHIDAGAM SRINIVAS
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION NO.16004 OF 2024
Mr. B.Shesu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioncr secks to withdraw the writ petition and places a Memo dalcd 22.1l.)O2,1 which states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as the parties have settled the dispute bctwcen themselves.
connected applications are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. I
/
\
SD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYii
SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to SRt B.SHESHU KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl
1
2 One CC to SRt p.RAMACHANDRAN, Advocate [OPUC]
3 One CC to SRt CHTDAGAM SRtN|VAS, Advocate tOpUCl
GJP UL
HIGH COURT'
DATED: 09112!2024
ORDER
WP.No.16004 of 2024
.A i t1! s
.i
i.
Zt in zrrzs
h
ac.3PATC HEO
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
v ,i
P.Vidya Sagar
Reserve Bank of India, Rep by its Governor
Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd (formerly Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd)
P.Abhijeet
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
