The High Court dismissed an old writ petition filed regarding the removal of illegal cellular tower structures installed in the petitioner's boundary wall for non-prosecution/default, due to the petitioner's failure to appear or respond during nearly a decade of hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
r (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
i WRIT PETITION NO: 32443 OF 2013
Between:
Routhu Raghava Rao, S/o China Seethaiah Age 65 Yrs Occ: BusinessRl/o H. No 3-52, Vaftikhammam pahad village, Chiwemla Village, Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER
AND1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary,
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmaybe pleased to lssue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lt/andamus, directing this Respondents to remove the cell tower,high power generator, batteries, and high tension electricity wires which were illegal instated by the Respondent no 4, in the boundary wall of the Petitioner house bearing no 3-52, Vattikhammampahad village, Chivveinla village,NalgoMa District, on the adjacent side, which is dangerous to human lives, consideringthe above stated facts and reasons in the interest ofjustice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WP P. NO: 40350 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto restrain the respondents No.4 from using the cell tower, highpower generator, batteries and high tension electricity wires which were illegalinstalled in the boundary wall of thepetitioner house bearing No.3-52, VattikhammamPahad Village, Chivvemla Village, Nalgonda district, on the adjacent side, whichis dangerous lo human lives pending disposal of the above writpetition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED AHMED ALI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI O. MANOHER Counsel for the Respondent No.4: - -- - The Court made the following: ORDER
THI HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.32443 of 2013
ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2013. On L8.12.2O23, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal'. Even today, when the matter is ca-lled, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.
petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT(EGISTRAR 1 YL/
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI SYED AHMED ALl, Advoc-qte [OPUC] i. il; cc i;SFiiF. nncuAveruDRA REDDY, Advocate[oPUc] 5. On" CC to SRI O.MANOHER' Advocate [OPUC] ;. i; cc.io-eiFonpnr.rcAAYnrRAJ & RURAL DEVELoPMENT'Hish Court for the State ofTelangana. [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies
BN GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810112024
ORDER
WP.No.32443 ot 2013
11E sr^f e
()
d q 12 riB 2o2r
fr"
c!l
fs rATc a
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
) )D"t*
Routhu Raghava Rao
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Gram Panchayat
The Divisional Engineer, APCPDCL.
M/s Reliance Communications Ltd.
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
