The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 14298 of 2012 and pending miscellaneous applications for non-prosecution/default, as the petitioner failed to appear on two listing dates.
None; writ petition and miscellaneous applications dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 I
i
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THEFOURTHDAYOF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITIONN0.14298 0F 2012
Between:
Smt. MamidiwarRadha,Wo M.Shyam Rao, HousewifeC/o K'Ramchender' H' No' 4-2-23712, MochigalliPost and Town, Adilabad
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith, the Highcourt maybe pleased to issue an order or directionor writ moreparticularly one in the natureof WritofMandamusdeclaringtheimpugnedorderDt.2S-4-2ol2passedbythefirst respondentasillegalandarbitraryandViolatestheprincplesofnaturalJustice and withoutjurisdiction and set aside the same, and consequentlydirectthe respondents not tointerfere and demolishthe construc{ion made by the petitioner as per sanctionedplandt.3-1 1-2010 in Plot No' 45 in Sy'No27lA of Mavala Village of AdilabadDistrict.
t
t.A. No:1 OF 2012lwPMP. NO: 18072 OF20121
Petition under Section151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition,the HighCourt may bepleased to direct thefirst respondentnot to demolish lhe structures in Plot No.45 in Sy.No. 2llA ofMavalaVillage by suspendingthe notice dt. 28-4-2012 issued by first respondentpending final disposal of main Writ Petition.
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI N. ASHOK KUMAR (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: SRI P. RAGHAVENOOR REDDY, STANDING COUNSEL FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH
Counselfor the RespondentNos.3 & 4: GP FORPANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The Court madethe following:ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No. L4298 of 2012
ORDER:
When the matter carne up for hearing on 14.12.2023 there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal,,. In spite of it, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this court has no option except to dismiss the writ petition for non_ prosecution/default.
).) Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand dismissed.
so/- KAVITHA
ASSISTANT IS
//TRUE COPY//
iECTION OFFICER
To, 1 One CC to SRI N. ASHOK Kl 2 o.l. !c'lo sili' d'lhtLit/ufiB#'fisBf?ir3l,o, o,.",, panchayath loPUCl 3 Two CCs to GP forpanchayal Raj-and Rural Development, High Court for the State_o1 T_etangana at Hydeiabad.'tOrt- - 4 Two CD Copies MP {dA.
ll
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410112024
_ :.<br>oof,
3'i u,.l i"i'] ..,,i
fr |- ,,f'
.i- F
RDER
WP.No.14298 of 2012
DlSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
re^
$
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Mamidiwar Radha
The Gram Panchayath, Mavala
The Divisional Level Panchayath Officer, Adilabad
The District Panchayat Officer, Adilabad
The District Collector, Adilabad
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
