Writ petition by a salon owner alleging police interference with his business pursuant to a Commissioner of Police notification. The Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of an earlier common order in W.P.No.16281 of 2010 and batch, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3296 ]
HIGH COURT FO R THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ial Original Jurisdiction) iftt*" MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR + I
PRESENT
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
'v$Rrperr ION NO: 2839 0F 2024
Between: , I
Splash Berauty saloon And .sna, Reo. by its proprietor Mamunur sai, s/o. Mamunur Sudhakar, Hindu,_Agid about 23 years, occ BusineJJ, nyo. Fibt-No 9PqnO IA,3rd Ftoor,302, SrilakshmiNagar Coiony,n,|-konOi, irri,iii6'"Ji (Jagir), Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, ,t Telangina State.
I ...PETITIONER
AND
I ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statediilt the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an app/opriate writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandhtus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned notiricA{iir No.(L & o)tM4t314ot2o't0, dated 30/06/2010 passed by the 2nd r"sponoellllf, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, viorative of Articre 14, rs(r ) (gj or tne consllll[lon of rndia, contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad city Police nct, rs+df tsri and consequenfly setaside the same against the petitioner, in the intereLFof justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under SJltion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sIpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend tne lmpugned I otification No.(L & O )lM4l31 4012010, dated: 3010612010 passed by the 2nd resfo ndent against the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petiti Counsel for the ,",,rtlr: SRI SANDEEP RANGU Counsel to. tn" n""J[rf,ents: AGp FoR HOME The court .aae tt " tJtltwi ng: ORDER
l
\ \
(-
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.2839 OF 2024
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the Court to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned notihcation No.(L&O)/Mal3140/2OlO, dated 30.06.2O10, as illegal and arbitrary.
2
/
i i I I i I I I I !
disposed of the said Writ Petitions uide common order, dated
28.09.2021 in W.P.Nos. 1628l of 2010 and batch.
passed by this Court in W.P.No. 16281 of 20lO and batch.
There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous
applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/.A.V.S.PRA$AD
ASSISTANT REGIST,RAR //TRUE COPY/'
, SECTION OFFICER
BSR GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0510212024
I
I
i
ORDER
WP.No.2839 of 2024
gE STATE oA
{
,
trco I B FTB NzT atc)
t Da*c
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS
Ar'4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police interference with the petitioner's beauty salon business based on the impugned notification was illegal and arbitrary?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Splash Beauty Salon And Spa, Rep. by its proprietor Mamunur Sai
The Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate
The Station House Officer, Raidurgam Police Station
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
