Writ petition seeking direction to register an FIR for alleged harassment. Court disposed of the petition as the respondent police station registered a case in Crime No.24 of 2024 after proceedings, redressing the grievance.
Writ petition disposed of without costs as FIR was registered by Respondent No.3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
I\4ONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY oF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PET]TION NO:2833 OF m24
Between:
[il:kSl.Ilr-fq:rge,w/o..KDinesh, .Agedabout s6 years,Ryo. -9_1335, ueen uayat nagar, Hanumakonda Mandal, Hanumakondi District.
AND ...PETITIONER
Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia ;r"T=r:t?Iffi-,1: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or writ more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.3 in not taking action upon the complaint made by the petitioner dated 24t1212023 against the unbearable physical violence and treating with force and outrage the modesty with abusive filthy and obscene language harassment of respondents 4 and 5 as violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of principles of Articles 14,1g and 21 of {he constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondent no.3 to protect the petitioners interest against the unbearable harassrnent of respondent no.4 and 5 by registering the FIR
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARESH KUMAR GORIGE Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 and 5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER
il I
THE HOT{'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PEf,ITION No.2833 of2O24
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226of the Constitution
of India, is frled seeking thefollowing relief:
"...to issue writ, orderor direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamusdeclaringthe action of respondent No.3 in nottaking actionupon tl.e compliant made by thepetitioner,dated24 -12.2023 against unbearable haraSsment ofrespondent Nos.4 ald 5 as violation of principles of naturaljusticeand in violation of principles of Articles 14, 19 and 2lof the Constitution of India and consequently to directrespondent No-3to protect the petitioners interest against theunbearable harassment of respondent Nos.4 and 5by registering FIR..."
2
\
Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari w, State of Uttar
Pradesht.
Miscellaleous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ
petition shall stand closed.
(2014) 2 SCC i
SD/- MOHD. SANAULI.A,H ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI N OFFICER
To,
TJ GJP s
I
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:0 5lO2l2OZ4
(
1 HE Sr4r 6- o/.
o 2 3 l'lAH 2024
t
O5SPATC
ORDER
WP.No.2833 of 2024
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS.
oqr14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of after the respondent police station registered a case on the petitioner's complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalitha Kumari v. State of Uttar PradeshReferred¶29
(2014) 2 SCC 442 · Who else cites this
[il:kSl.Ilr-fq:rge
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Its Secretary, Home (General) Department
The Superintendent of Police, Bhupalpally
The Station House Officer, Ghanpur Mulugu
Ponaganti satheesh
Ponaganti Syngath
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
