Rathod Eeramma, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging non-registration of a crime complaint. Court directed police (respondent No.3) to furnish closure report to petitioner for further legal action without an explicit disposal of the main petition.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Respondent No.3 to furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner.
What the court decided
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 20166 OF 2023
Between:
Rathod Eeramma, W/o. Late Rathod @ Lambadi Nanya Aged about58 Years, Occ- House hold Rio. H No.6-2'1, KondakalThandaKondakalVillage ShankarpallyMandal, Ranga Reddy District
...PETITIONER
AND
- 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its PrincipalSecretary, Home Department Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad
- 2 The Commissioner of Police, CyberabadCommissionerate Gachibowli, Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police are obligated to register a FIR and investigate cognizable offences under Section 154 CrPC upon receipt of a complaint regarding civil dispute
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rathod Eeramma
- respondent
State of Telangana
- respondent
Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
- respondent
Station House Officer, Mokila P.S.
- respondent
Patholoth Thulichya
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/20166/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court