Disposed

Dema Krishnaveni v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Oct 2024WP/27442/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition filed by a landowner alleging arbitrary refusal to incorporate agricultural land into her new pattadar passbook and title deed. The petitioner challenged the inaction of revenue respondent No.2 regarding an online correction application, claiming violation of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's online application No. 2400009350 dated 05.03.2024, afford notice to affected parties, complete the exercise within eight weeks, and pass a

Dema Krishnaveni Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

[3168 ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 27442 OF 2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

Dema Krishnaveni, W/o Late Dema Lakshmi Narsaiah Aged 63^yearsOcc. Agriculture Fl/o Kanakunta village, Gumadidala^IVIandal Sangareddy^District

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary^Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Collector, Sangareddy District, Sangareddy

¶14

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division,^{SangareddyDistrict} 4. The Tahsildar, Gummadidala Mandal, Medak District

¶15

...RES.ONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the^{action of the respondents in not} incorporating agriculture land in Sy.No.39lA2^{Ac 0.18gts and Sy.No.38/EAc 0-09} 1/2 gts. situated at Kanakunta village, Gummadidala^{Mandal, SangareddyDistrict} in new pattadar^pass book and title deed,^{pursuant to applicationin Dharani portal} reference No.2400009350 d1.5.O3.2O24 as illegal,^{arbitrary and in violation of} principles of natural^justice and contrary to the provisions of Telangana^{Rights in} Land and Pattadar Pass Books Acl,2O2O and^{consequentlydirect the respondents} to incorporate the same.

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct} the respondents to incorporate agriculture^{land in Sy.No 39lA2 Ac 0.18 gts and}

¶19

Sy.No. 38/E Ac 0-09 1/2 gts. situated at Kanakunta village, Gummadidala Mandal, Sangareddy District in new pattadar pass book and title deed,^pursuant to application in Dharani portal reference No.2400009350 dt.5.03.2024 situated at Gumdidala village and Mandal, Sangareddy Districtand pass necessary orders, as otherwise petitioner stands to suffer serious hardship and rrreparable loss and injury.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.MANOHAR Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.27442 of 2024

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Heard Sri N. Manohar, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. Perused the record.

¶26

The petitioner is claiming that she is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.O-18^gts., 1n Sy.No.39c2, Ac.0-13 gts., each in Sy.Nos.4oes2, Ac.O-04 gts., 1n Sy.46ee2 and Ac.O-O9Yz gts., 1n Sy.No.3BE situated at Kanakunta village, Gummadidala Mandal, Sanga Reddy district. She is also the owner of land in other survey numbers of the very same village. In the latest pattedar passbook and title deed, land admeasuring Ac.O-18^gts., ln Sy.No.39es2 and Ac.O-O9Y" gts 1n Sy.No.38A are missing. Therefore, according to the petitioner, there are^{wrong entries. In}

¶27

KL.J w P Na 2 t'412 ol 2024

¶28

¶29

proof of the same, she has filed copies of old and latest pattedar pass books, title deeds and Dharani Status. She has submitted an online application bearing No.2400009350 dated 05.O3.2024 with respondent No.2 with a request to correct the said wrong entries and issue E-pattedar pass book and title deeds. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said oniine application, respondent No.2 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.2 petitioner filed the present writ petition.

¶30

Whereas learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.2 will consider the said online application submitted ln by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, accordance with law.

¶31

In view of the aforesaid discussion, this writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the online application bearing No.2400009350 dated

¶32

KL,J W P No 27.142 of 202.r

¶33

05.O3.2024 submitted by the petitioner and^pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law by putting the petitioner and all affected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. If, respondent No.2 is not inclined to accept the request made by the^petitioner, he shall pass an order assigning specific reasons and communicate copy of the said order to the^{petitioner.He} shall complete the entire exercise within^aperiod of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any,^pending

¶35

in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPYi/

SD/.T. TIRUMALA,OEVI ASSISTANT REGIS,fRAR r-i sEcIoN dYrrcen

¶40

The Principal Secretary Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶41

The District Collector, Sangareddy District, Sangareddy J. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division, Sangareddy District 4. The Tahsildar, Gummadidala lt/landal, lrledak District A One CC to SRI N.IVIANOHAR, Advocate [OPUC] b. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶42

Two CD Copies

PSK. 856 :,vA

HIGH COURT

DATED:0311012024

ORDER

WP.No.27442 of 2024

-i'ri
14
.,t'. ..
!. 16 DU
2U1 (t\r;'
,.,
\ r)s :l -c+,,7

¶49

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.

¶50

Dema Krishnaveni v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dema Krishnaveni v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.J.Dhanamma @ J. Dhani Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Rukki Bai Vs The State of Telangana

Thalla Lakshmi Bai Vs The State of Telangana

Venkatappa, Vs The State of Telangana

Ibrahim khan Vs The State of Telangana

Mateti Prasad Vs The State of Telangana