Special Leave Petitioner challenged demolition of residential house without notice and due process. Court issued interim order directing respondents not to dispossess petitioner without following due procedure, while noting a potential violation of G.O.Ms.No.58 regarding issuance of assignment pattas, but allowing action post-compliance.
[none]
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31681
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THETHIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTIGE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:27395oF 2024
Between:
lbrahim khan, s/oNizamuddinkhan, Aged40-vears' Occ Business'R/oH No. 5- 24- raslr,''ffiR""illgii-r'i9"ie- S'eva'--Masiid-e- rahmaniva' Gljrrlr"frrtrr'itl"acnat-Malk;jgiri,Telangana-500055 ...pErroNER
on?.
,n" state ofrelangana,Repby its Principal ge.crelaryr Departmentof ' R;il;, se"reiiti"it euinings,'secretariat' Hyderabad 2 Hvderabadoisaster irziponiJ'"noAsset Monitorinoand Protection ' irivDliAni Ci;i,'t;.i;,pi;ffiini.i;J"n rno Urban"Development,Rep. try its bommissi6ner,Secretariat, Hyderabad' - - 3. LakeprotectionC#fi i#,' riGir-u"o ru.ttopolitan DevelopmentAuthoritv "'#;. ;y'tt-lii;il"p"liian -coinniiisioner' Am-eeipet Hvderabad' 4. The DistrictcorrectorlntEil'jii.iJo13iii&.Office'Compiexes, Anthaipallv Villaqe, SnameerpeiiriianO%it'lleocr'al - Malkajgiri District-500078' ---^5. ilffi Ui il;;'drrrce-;,'b rihfill il;'ut "o "-ti5 t- M aI kai si ri'' ::'l"t; "u333:i* Petition underArticle226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtoissueawrit'orderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureofa WRIT OFMANDAMUS aggrievedby the actionof the RespondentNo' 2' demolishingthe ResidentialHouseof the Petitioner Survey No' 329/1 ' Devender Nagar, GajularamaramVillage, QuthbullapurMandal' (erstwhile RangaReddy District), Medchal-Malkajgiri Districton 06 0S 2024' withoutgiving prior to notice tothepetitionerandwithoutfollowingthedueprocessoflawasillegal,arbitrary' violationofprinciplesofnaturaljusticeandfundamentalrightsguaranteedunder Articles14,21AND300-Aoftheconstitutionoflndia,consequently,directthe respondentsnot to interferewith peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over thesubject property which was assignedto Petitioner by the RespondentNo.5videProceedingsNoB/25l2015'Daled29tO5l2015,againstthe petitionersapplicationNo.BPLRR,Dl50l230555l0andhavingtheElectricity Connectionwith USC No. 114726429
IA NO i 1 0F 2024
Petition under Section151CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in suppo(of the petition,the High courtmay be pleasedto not to disposes the Petitionerfrom the subject property survey No 329/1 , Devender Nagar, GajularamaramVillage, Quthbullapur Mandal, (erstwhile RangaReddy District), Medchal-Malkajgiri District pending disposalof the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI U SHANTHI BHUSHAN RAO
Counsel for RespondentNos. 1, 4 & 5: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT
Counsel for RespondentNo. 2: SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY, SC FOR HYDRAA
Counsel for RespondentNo. 3: SRIV. NARASIMHAGOUD, SC FOR HMDA
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEI( LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITIONNo.27395 OF 2024
ORAL ORDER:
Heard leamed counselfor the petitioner,learnedAssistant Govemment Pleader for Assignmentappearingon behalfof respondent Nos.l, 4 and 5, Mr. KatikaRavinder Reddy,learnedStanding Counsel for HYDRAA appearing on behalfof respondentNo'2 and Mr' V' Narasimha Goud, learned StandingCounselfor HMDAappearingon behalf of respondent No.3.
2
KI.J W P No 27395 of2024
down under law. Challenging the said action of respondent No.5,the petitioner filed the present urit pctition
Assignment and leamed Standing Counsel appearing forHYDRAA and HMDA, on instructions, would submit that the respondents will follow the due procedure laid down under law before taking action in respect of the subject property.
KLJ W.P. No 2739J of202.l
\
/
G.O.Ms.No.58. dated30.12.2014. In the circumstances ofthe case, there
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, iniscellaneousp€titions, if any,pending in the
'ITRUEcoPY//
sEcrtoNoFFlcER
/
To,
I
2 3 4.q 6. 7. 8. a Two CDCoPies
MBC
GJP
s
;il ti ?
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0311012024
-l HE s14
.; iii'
$
]D
.,) il
2 4 0ir zul ii
o,-.'- "r-,-rr,9
ORDER
WP.No.27395 of 2024
DISPOSING OF WRIT PETITION
@f{^*
g,n --
6,\k
WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be dispossessed without following due procedure under law.
Whether the extension of protection order to respondents 2 to 4 is proper without violating conditions of G.O.Ms.No.58.
Ibrahim Khan
State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary Department of Housing
Telangana State Disaster Response Fund - Town and Country Planning Department
Hyderabad Metropolitan DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
District Collector Malkajgiri
K. Laksman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
