The High Court of Telangana dismissed the writ petition filed against an arbitral award as infructuous due to the efflux of time, without any order as to costs.
None. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:27274 OF 2017
Between:
T.. Narsimulu, S/o. Late T. Mofathaiah, Aged about 37 years, Occ ; Govt. Service, E/q.t-t tlq 4-5511, Ambetkariotony,JadcierlaViltagea'nd MrnAaf,'fr.l-af,"Orbn;';u,. District-509302.
.....PETITIONER
AND
1 Tte Stat: of Te1:;r3ana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, - Revenue (Reg;s[13t136 -ll) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
...,.RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of
capacity of the arbitrator and issuing the recovery certificate o a sum of Rs. 2,30,45 aiong with interest or 18o/o per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 2,03,4771- frcm 11-0s-2012 to till date of realization with costs of 10,868/- against the petitioner and his guarantors including issuance of the consequential recovery certificate U/ sec. 71 of the Act, as illegal, arbitrary and
withoutjurisdiction contrary to the provisions of Rule 4B(2) of the A.P. Chits Funds Rules 2008 and consequently to set aside the award daled 23-11-2013 passed in ARB/CIaim Petition No. 80/2012 passed by the 3rd respondent.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 33871 OF 2017)
Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the award dated 23-11-2013 passed in ARB/CP/No. 8012012 passed by the 3,d respondent including the consequential execution of the award through E.P. No. 215 of 2014 on the file of Principal. Senior Civil Judge, at fvlahabubnagar as against the petitioner and his guarantors, pending disposal of main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.SURYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : --
The Court made the following ORDER
HONOURAtsLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITIO N No.27274 OF 2017
ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
closed. No order as to costs.
SD/- L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SEC OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:2811112024
ORDER
WP.No.27274 of 2017
r'*
1BE sr4
o
2 E t1t, ?M5 2
c'.
-4
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
c
l 7D)E
T.. Narsimulu
Government of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Registrar of Chits, Government of Telangana
The Deputy Registrar of Chits/ Arbitrator, Mahabubnagar District
Yr, Kapil Chits (Hyderabad) pvt. Ltd.
N.V. Shrvan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
