Writ petition by plot owners seeking mandamus to permit house construction on their plots in Nizampet Village, which respondents had allegedly obstructed without reasons. No representation for petitioners on two listings; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 1594 OF 2016
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS questioning the action of the Respondents in not allowing the construction in Petitioners Plot Nos.15, 16, 18, 33, 34, and 35, each 60 sq.yards
in Sy.No.191, of Nizampet Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without assigning any reasons or without following any due process of law by declaring their arbitrary action is being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents to permit the construction of the houses in Petitioners Plot Nos.15, 16, 18, 33, 34, and 35, each 60 sq. yards in Sy.No.19l of Nizarnpet Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
l.A. NO: 1OF 201(i(WP MP. NO: 2015 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to permit the construction of the houses rn Petitioners' PIot Nos.15,'16, 18,33,34 and 35, each 60 sq. yards in Sy.No.19'1 of Nizampet Village, Qutbullapu r lr,4andal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. PENJURI VENUGOPAL
Counsel for the Rerspondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI P. KISHORE RAO SC FOR GP .\
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI WSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITIONNo.1594of 2OL6
ORDER:
This writ petitionis coming for hearing since 2O16'On 2g.l1.2}24when the matter was called, there was no representationon behalf of the petitioners, artd therefore 'the matter wasdirectedto be listed on 20 '12 '2024 under the caption "fordismissal'. Today i'e', 20'12'2O24' whenthe matter is called,there is no representationon behalf of the petitioners. Itseems that the petitionersare not interestedto prosecute thiscase.
Pending miscellaneousapplications,ifany inthis petition, shallstand ^rr,r?R',;Ia'#$,FiF/ IITRUECOPY/I SECNONOFFTCER
\
To, 1. OneCC to SRI'PENJURIVENUGOPALAdvocate IOPUCI
r ea nsa n a 2 3 ?i' ii lju,::l:*mff"sf:::"""?'ie'r touTi 4. TwoCD CoPies KKS GJP (rr-(."-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011:212024
ORDER
1 ;rE S 14,
k
/ 'r
,)
i
L) 0 4 t;;; 2c25 c
.1.
li5:'a
<br>
WP.No.1594 of2016
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
,frua \A{*E
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. C. Hemalatha
Aleshwaram Narsing Rao Lalitha
Smt. N. Roja Kumari
Smt V. Hemalatha
Smt. K. Rani Pushpalatha
Smt. Badasangi Rekha
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
