THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 2632 OF 2016
Between:
Sri Dhanalaxmi Agro lndustries rep. by lts Managing Partner, Palacharla Sunil Kumar, S/o: P.Krihna, aged about 35 years, Business, Classic Paper Road, Gundaram Village, Nizamabad District.
.,,PETITIONER
AND
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Para (ii) of GOMS No. 451 Agriculture and Cooperation (MKTG-l) Department dt.'19-'l 1- 2005 is arbitrary, illegal, violation of the provisions of the Markets Act and violative of Article 14, 19 (1 Xg) and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3'd respondent to refund the market fee paid on the rice to the petitioner
l.A. ILO:1 OE2016(WPMP. NO: 3308 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
stay the operation of Para 4.(ii) of GOMS No. 451 Agriculture & Co-operatio n---t(MKTG-|) Departmentdt. 19-112005 pending disposal of the aboveW.P.
Counsel forthe Petitionen SRI KJAYA KUl,tAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l and 2: GP FOR AGRICULTURE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI G. NEERA.TA REDDY, SC
The Court made tfie folloring: ORDER
;,{
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.2632 of 2OL6
ORDER:
When the matter carne up for hearing on 12.Og.2O24, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal". In spite of it, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this court has iro option except to dismiss the writ petition for non_ prosecution/default.
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAM BA -/ ASSISTANT EGIS //TRUE COPYII
To,
SE ON OFFTCER
jffff*i"#ifJ{tr'FJ,ffil:fl',,"s8'.fl'"3in'i.,.,".rreansanaa, TJ GJP)yr
=:-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912024
...-
,€
1o ul ztfi r
c:
. 1
ORDER
WP.No.2632 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON FOR NON PROSEC UTION/DE FAU LT
WITHOUT COSTS
4bP'8 rih,P
r,! E
Dhanalaxmi Agro Industries
State of Telangana
Commissioner & Director of Marketing
Agricultural Market Committee
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
