The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.18440 of 2015 filed by two petitioners challenging a cooperative tribunal order due to non-prosecution/default in appearance, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITIO N NO:18,140 OF 2015
Between:
.'ET'TIONERS
AND
4 M;.M;frd Moulana,' the thenDy.Regisirar.oA TheDy Registrar.of Cooperatives, San!a Reddy,(Thrciugh- the Dy.Registrar of cooperatives Sanoa Reddv Medak Dist.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ollhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High court may be pleased to lssue a writ or order moreparticularly in the nature of Writ of Certiori calling for the records relatingto the impugned orderpassed by the chairperson, Telangana coop.Tribunalin cTA No.7/20 13 dt-31stday of December,2014and quash the same as being perverse and contraryto law
-7
l.A. NO:1 OF 201
PMP. N O:23860 OF 2015
PetitionunderSectionl51CPCprayingthatinthecircumstances"statedin theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto suspend theoperationof the impugned orders passedby the 8th Respondentin CTA No.7t13dl.31stDecember, 2014 pending disposalof the writ petition
Counsel forthe Petitioner:SRI' J' P' RAO
Counsel for theRespondent Nos' 1,2,5,9to11: GP FORCOOPERATION
Counsel for theRespondent Nos' 6&7: SRI P' VENKATREDDY
Counsel for theRespondent Nos' 3&4:-
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
l
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.18440 of 2015
ORDER:
When the matter carne up for hearing on05.O8.2024, there was no representation for the petitioners, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal". In spite of it, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this Court has no option except to dismiss the r,r,rit petition for non prosecution/default.
prosccution /default. No order as to costs. 3 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this r,l,rit
petition, shall stand dismissed.
SD/-A.V.S.PR AD ASSISTANTREGIS RAR //TRUE GOPY' \ SECTION OFFICER
I
To, 1. One CC toSRl. J. P. RAO, Advocate [OP.UC]^ i. i;; carl"-Giron co6pEnAitoli ,Hist''court for the state of Telanoana at HYderabadIOUT'I a o"nJ'ct'i6 siii'P.tENKAt nebov, Advocate[oPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies BM GJP
av
E
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912024
ORDER
1 HC STA r€
(
A.
I
v
11 0E[ 202+
vc/
vy-z
WP.No.18440 of2015
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS
e
,alr vV^
V.Hari Prasada Chary
V.Pandu
State of Telangana
The Chairman, Telangana Coop.Tribunal
Justice K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
