The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 1353 of 2016 for non-prosecution/default as the petitioner failed to appear and file representation on the listing dates.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 1353 OF 2016
Between:
Sri. K.C. Venugopal, S/o Chittanranjan, Aged 47 yearc, H.No. 1-7-161, Sai Nivas, 3rd Floor, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES,ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a suitable writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to ARC 12212014 on the file of the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies/Divisional Cooperative Officer, Golconda Division/ Arbitrator, Golconda Division, Hyderabad and quash the final order therein Dt-30-12-2015 by declaring that the order was passed without following the principles of natural justice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 1702OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstarrces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all furttrcr proceedings including execution of the order Dl:30-12-2015 in ARC 12212014 on the file of the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies/Divisional
cooperative officer, GolcondaDivision/Arbitrator, Golconda Division,Hyderabad pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.A.V.RATNAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO3: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.1353 of 2OL6
ORDER:
When the matter came up for hearing on O5.O8.2O24, there was no representation for thepetitioner, therefore the matter was directed to be listedtoday underthe caption 'for dismissal". In spite of it, todaya-lso there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Courthas no option except to disrniss the writpetition fornon- prosecution/default.
prosecution/default. No order as to costs.
petition, shall stand dismissed.
SD/.K.VE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
'ITRUE..PY'/ sec.kprrcea
To 1 2 ?*: 33 JifSt o "SSEeH^+gffi ii:'tf[J'? ro r th e Stateor re rang a n a' at HYderabad. [OUTI 3. Two CDCoPies PSK. GJP Y1-
t
0
HIGH COURT
DATE D : 0 210912024
ORDER
WP.No.1353 of 2016
,;i.-<br>..?.2,
4 tl E .S ,-,1 14:
'e' )R',
I ,-.)
1 | t),c lt24
o
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION FOR NON-PROSEGUTION/DEFAULTWITHOUT COSTS.
c@
W
ff"<br>
K.C. Venugopal
State of Telangana
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
