Disposed

Sri. Arvind Agarwal, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Sept 2024WP/24889/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition questioning the non-disposal of an appeal against a fine imposed under petroleum licensing rules. The Court directed the petitioner to furnish relevant documents and the Respondent to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to Respondent No. 2 to dispose of the appeal expeditiously after the petitioner furnishes the relevant documents.

Sri. Arvind Agarwal, Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 24889 OF 2016

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri Arvind Agarwal, S/o. Sri. Tej Prakash Agarwal, Aged 32 years, Occ Proprietor Arvind Gas Agency, Bharat Gas Distributors, Bellampalli, Adilabad District

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Civil Supplies Department, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Hyderabad.

¶12

The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Govt, of Telangana, Civil Supplies Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶13

3 The Collector (CS), Adilabad District , -

¶14

The Tahsildar, Bellampalli. Adilabad District., -

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or darection more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent no. 2 herein in not passing any orders on the appeal petition dated 30.04.2014 filed Under clause 31(1)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Petroleum Products^(Licensing and Regulation of Supplies), 1980 as illegal, arbitrary. violative of^principles of natural^justice, violations of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution Of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent no 2 to daspose of the appeal in a fixed time frame.

¶17

¶18

t.A. NO: 10F 201 P. NO: 30725 OF 20¹⁶⁾

¶19

Petition under Section 151^{CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto} suspend the order dt:01-04-2014^{passedin Proc.No.C57119112012imposinga} fine of Rs.25,0001 on the^{petitionerby the respondent No.3}

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.SURYA^SATISH

¶21

Counsel for the Respondents: GP^{FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES}

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.24889^{of 2OL6}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This petition is tiled^{questioning the action ofthe} respondent No.2 in not^{disposing of the appeal filed by the} petitioner under Clasue 3l^{(1) (a)} of^{the Andhra Pradesh} Petroleum Product {Licencing^{& Regulation of Supplies), 1989} and a sought a direction^{to the respondnet No.2 to disposeof} the appeal.

¶26

Heard the learned Counscl^{lor the petitionerand the} learned Assistant Go'.'ernmct-rt^{Pleader forCivil Supplies} appearing for the respondents.

¶27

The learned Assistant^{Government Pleder forCivil} Sqpplies would submits that the Respondent \ No.2/Commissioner tbr Civii Strpplies^{issuedan Endorsement} I! Lr.No.E2l l7O2l2Ol4 datcd^{20-O5-2O14to thepelitiongr..-''}

¶28

¶29

directing him furnish Original orders of passed by the Collector (CS), Adilabad dated Ot.O4.2Ot4 and Proc. No.CS7 / 191 / 20t2 dated' 28.03 .2OI4 for taking further necessary action in the matter

¶30

In view of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government pleader for Civil Supplies, this Writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to furnish the relevant documents as sought for by the respondent No.2 and after submissions of the relevalt documents, the respondent No.2 is directed to dispose of the appeal, expeditiouslv as possible. No order as to costs.

¶31

5' Miscerla,eous applications pending, if irn_v, rr.r this writ Petitiqjt sha-ll stan closed.

¶32

¶33

SO/- N. SRIHARI o5srsrANrllEfISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION O FFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

1 The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana. Civil Supplies Department,

¶36

Secretariat Hyderabad.

¶37

2 The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Govt_ of Telangana, Civil Supplies Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶38

3 The Collector (CS), Adilabad District., -

¶39

4 The Tahsildar, Bellampalli, Adilabad District., .

¶40

5 One CC to SRI T.SURYA SATISH, Advocate. IOPUCI 6 Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPL|ES,'Hrgh bourt for the State of Telangana. [OUTI

¶41

7 Iryo CD Copies. Q t BSK <sup>rr

ti i

HIGH COURT

DATED:0610912024

ORDER

WP.No.24889 of 2016

4
E Sr4r
{
(
co 2 3 i'iiril il2l .L\a
,r- {-
Dlgo1: -..--z ,- rr

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶51

?+ ll >\ 1 <sup>oCcA.u5

Sri. Arvind Agarwal, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Arvind Agarwal, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Mahalakshmi Cotton Seed and Oil Industries Vs The State of Telangana

Madasi Kurva Rachala Bheema Raju Vs The State of Telengana

Kotha Guruvaiah Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

R.Balreddy Vs The State of Telangana

C.S. Susheel Kumar, Vs Shri.Dr.Jithender,Ips

M/s. Janaki Trading Company Vs The State Of Telangana