Contempt petition alleging violation of the Court's order in a writ petition. The Government Pleader submitted that the official respondents had complied with the writ orders; recording this, the Court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND.TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 826 OF 2024
Contempt Case under Section 10 lo 12 ot Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 lo punish the Respondents herein for willful, deliberate and intentionally violating the orders of this Court dated 27 .03.2023 passed in W.p.No.21 589 of 2022.
Between:
C.S. Susheel Kumar,, S/o Late Satyanarayana Aged About 55 years, Occ. Seni or Assistant, Forensic Science Lbboratriry, Tela-ngana, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner
AND
... Respondents
Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant GP representing Additional Advocate General
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEK.SARATH CONTEMPT CASE No.826of2024
ORDER:
Today, when the matter istaken up for hearing, leamed .{ssistant GovernmentPleader representing learned A dditional Advocate Generalsubmits that the oIficial respondents werecomplied the orders passedby this Court in W.P.No.21589 of2022, dated 27.1)3.2023. In view of the same, the causeof actiondoes not survive and no further orders are requiredto be passerl in this matter.
stand closed.
SD/- T KRISHNAKUMAR' DEPUTYIREGISTRAR.
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
1 . One CC t,:Sri G Ravinder, Advocate [OPUCI 2. Two CCsto the Advocate i"^Li"i ii'gf' Cou(for the Stateof Telanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]
ADK
?,ttl
I I t i 1 1 i
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610912024
ORDER
GC.No.826of 2024
2.----:-::.j .-.-
1I '4t "..:X<br>(i
,l,I
1 ir 2024 I
,t
(-
CLOSINGTHE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUTCOSTS
!$c..
ldro\t-{'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully violated the Court's order dated 27.03.2023 in W.P.No.21589 of 2022.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
C.S. Susheel Kumar
Shri. Dr. Jithender, IPS
Shri. Ravi Gupta (FAC)
Smt. Shikha Goel
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
