Petitioners challenged seizure of rice and a vehicle by state authorities. The court closed the writ petition based on submissions that no further orders were required following interim orders passed earlier.
Writ petition closed; no further orders passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 10252 OF 2024
Between
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, moreparticularly one in thenatureof WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring.the action of therespondentsin seizing 40 quintals rice as well as the vehicle lVlahindra Bolero Pickup van beatingno.TS-19- T4-5026 on 20-03-2024 in connection with crime numbervide FIRNo 44 OF 2024 on the file of Jaipur P.S., without conductingany enquiry,as illegal, arbitrary, withoutjurisdiction, violative ofprinciples ofnaturaljustice and in
violation of articles 14 19 and 21 of the constitutionof lndia andconsequently direct the respondents to release the riceas wellas the said veh,cle.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the HighCourt may be pleasedto direct the respondents to .release theMahindra Bolero Pickupvan bearing no.TS- '19-T4-5026 along with the rice of . 40 quintals seized in connection with crime number vide FIR No 44 OF 2024 20-03-2024on thef ile of Jaipur P S ,pending disposal of the above writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.LAKSHMAREDDY
Counsel for the Respondents No.1to5: GPFORCIVIL SUPPLIES
Counsel for the Respondents No.6 : GPFOR HOME
The Court made the following:ORDER
I I I
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH IIIRIT PETITTON No.LO252of2O2+
ORDER:
Today, when the matteris taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearingfor the petitioners submits that in view of theinterim orders passedby this Court on 1g.O4.2O24, no furtherorders required to be passed in this matter for further adjudication.
Miscellaneouspetitions,if any, pending sha1l stald closed.
.SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT EGI
//TRUECOPY// SE N OFFICER
To,
2,TwoCCstoGPFoRclvllSUPPLIES,HighcourtfortheStateof Telangana. [OUTI
4 Two CDCopies
q$-
BSK
I t
HIGH COURT
DATED:06l0gl2O24
ORDER
WP.No.10252 of 2024
e. 1HE sla
( o
/
(
o
t 0r Dil 2024
t),l
oFsn
^fa nr-o
CLOS!NG THE WRITPETITION WITHOUT COSTS I
lL 1( 2L(
*
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Janaki Trading Company
Syed Faizan Ali
State Of Telangana
The Collector, Mancherial
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
