Dismissed

Rekala Ramdas v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Dec 2024WP/24517/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the rejection of e-pattadar pass book applications. The Court held that since a comprehensive civil suit had been instituted by the petitioner, the writ petition must be disposed of by directing them to pursue the pending suits in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by directing the petitioner to pursue the pending comprehensive civil suit seeking declaration and injunction regarding the subject lands.

Rekala Ramdas Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 24517 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Rekala Ramdas, S/o Hanumanthu, Aged about 75^{years, Occ-Agriculture,} Rl/o. Tekula Somaram villager, Bhuvanagiri Mandal,^{Yadadri- Bhuvanagiri} District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Chief Commissioner Land Administration, Telangana State^{at Hyderabad} 3. The District Collector, Yadadri - Bhongiri District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhongiri Division, Yadadri^{- Bhongiri District.} 5. The Tahsildar, Bhongiri Division, Yadadri^- Bhongiri District.

¶13

Ravi Santhosh Reddy, S/o. Sathi reddy, Aged about 52^years, Occ: Agdculture, Rl/o. Bollepally Village, Bhuvanagiri Mandal, Yadadri-Bhongiri District.

¶14

Ravi Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Sathi Reddy, Aged about 49^years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri"/o. Bollepally Village, Bhuvanagiri Mandal, Yadadri-^Bhongiri district.

¶15

Ravi Narayana Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, Aged about 52^years,Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Bollepally Village, Bhuvanagiri Mandal, Yadadri-Bhongiri District.

¶16

Ravi Anjamma, W/o. Ragunath Reddy, Aged about 50^years, Occl Agriculture, Fl/o. Bollepally Village, Bhuvanagiri Mandal,^{Yadadri-Bhongiri} District.

¶17

Rekala Rajasekhar, S/o. Late Shettaiah, Aged about 55^years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Tekkula Somaram village of Bhuvanagiri mandal,^Yadadri- Bhongiri District.

¶18

1 1. Rekala Lingaiah, S/o. Hanumanthu, Aged about 73^years, Occ:^Agriculture, Rl/o. Tekkula Somaram Village of Bhuvanagiri Mandal, Yadadd-Bhonigiri District.

¶19

'12. Rekala Anjaiah, S/o. Hanumanthu, Aged about 68 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fyo. Tekkrla Somaram village of Bhuvanagiri Mandal,^{Yadadri-Bhongiri} District.

¶20

Rekala Anandam, S/o. Hanumanthu,^{Aged about 63 years, Occ: Agriculture,} Rl/o. Tekkula Somaram Village^{of Bhuvinagiri Mandal' Yadadri-Bhongiri} District.

¶21

(Respondent Nos.6 to 13 are impleaded as^{perCourt Order dt: 18.12'2O24in} lA'No 1i2o24) ...RESP.NDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of the^{Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ order or direction more^{particularlyone in the natureof} writ of Mandamus, by declaring^{the action of RespondentNo.5in rejecting the} online applications of the^{Petitionerfor issuance of e- PattadharPassBooks in his} favour with regard to the^{landto an extent of Ac.3-109t in sy No. 608' AC. 6-30gts} in Sy No. 609, total land to an extent^{of Ac.10-00gts situated at Bollepally Village,} Bhongiri Mandal, Yadadri^{- Bhongiri District, and issuedEndorsementvide LR} No.8/296.1/2019, Dt- 19/OB/2023 with all^{false and incorrect statementsby} disobeying the orders^{of the Hon'ble High court in wP No.11105/2023is illegal,} arbitrary and violation of articles^{14, 15,21and 300(4)of constitution of lndiaand} violation of the^principles of^{natural justice,consequently set asidethe} Endorsement vide LR No.B^{/296't12019, Dt- 1910812023issued by the} Respondent No. 5,^{further directthe Respondentsto issuee- pattadharpass} books in favour of the Petitioner^{with regard to the above said land.}

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High court may be pleased to direct} the Respondent No.s to^{issue e- pattadar pass book in favourof the Petitioner} with regard to land to an extent of^{Ac.3-'l0gtin sy No.608, AC. 6-30gtsin Sy No.} 609, total land to an extent^{of Ac.1O-oogts situatedat Bollepally Village,Bhongiri} Mandal, Yadadri^- Bhongiri^{District, pending disposal of the writ petition.}

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI RAPOLUBHASKAR} Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1^{TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE} Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 TO^{9: SRI B.MOHAN} Counset for the Respondent Nos.l0 TO^{13: SRI G.SAWANARAYANA YADAV}

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

¶28

I I

¶29

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO.24517 OF 2q23

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

This u,rir petition is l'iled lor thc Iirlkru,ing rc-liel'

¶33

"-....to tsslae ct uit, orcler or direttittrt nutre porli<.ttlcrrlq, ote in t.he notltre oJ Wril of Mandonuts, by rleclanrry tle ct<.tion oJ- rt:sltonclent No.s it rcjecting the onl rc epplicottous oJ'llri petttiorter lo-r tssu.tnc" uf e-Pcttador Pess Books it his fouottr willr rerlarrl to tlte lottcl t() on extett of Acs.3.lO gts., irt 5g.No.608, Acs.6.JL, gts'., irr Sy_No.609, t()tet tend to at_t extenl oJ Acs.lO.O0 gts., sitLtuted at llollepall4 uilkrqe, Rlongin MtutdaL Yadadi-Bhongiri District, rutLl issLrid'i,tduri"rtett ut(le LR.No.R/2961/2O19, tlated 19.08.2023 Ll,ith c l false arul in<.offe<.t t::,:i!*:r!: by disobegbry the orders o] ttrc t t(rt,bk, l liqlt Coud itt WP No. I 1 1O5_ ^of 2O23 is illegal, arbitrary ut|.l uiolQtiotL <ti tutictes t ,1, 15, 2l and 3O0(A) of Constittrtiort of htclia orcl uiolatiotl cti pnrt<.iptes of r.tatural justice, consequentl!.| sel (si(le the litttlorsenct utde. l,R.No.B/2561/2O19, dated l9.OB.2O2.} is-srred rll respotrclet No.g 4111q1 for^{otherappropriate} reliefs".

¶34

It is stated that the petitioncr filed an application on the file of'respondent No.S seeking correction ol the entries relating to the land admeasuring Acs.3. lO gts., ancl Acs.6.3O gts., in Sy.Nos.60g and 609 respectively, situated at Bollepalll. village, Bhongiri Mandal,. Yadadri-Bhongiri District, and for issuance of e_pattadar pass books.

¶35

The grievance of the petitioner is that respondcnt No.s issucd thc impugned Endorsenrent ukle Lr.No.B /,2961 /2019, dateci 19.O8.2023, rejecting the sairl erpplic:rtion submitted by the pe t ll roncr

¶36

wP'24117_2r.J23

¶37

¶38

Learncd counsel appearing for the parties submittecl that various suils havc been ir-rstituted by the inter se parties on the very same srrlr.jccl land. [t is also submitted that questioning the l3-B certificatc issucd in favour of the contesting respondents and also after rclet--ting tt-re applications filed by the petitioner, he has instituted a t:omprchensive civil suit seeking declaration and consequcntial in_lunction in respect of the subject lands of the writ petition.

¶39

This Courl, u,ithout going into the merits of the case, since it is stated th;lr rtrc pctitioncr has instituted a compre lre.sive suit secking declirration, decms it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by rck--g:rt ing thc petitioner to pursue the pcnding suits, in accordancc ',vir h law.

¶40

(r With tlic s;rid observations, the writ petition is clisposcd o[

¶41

Misr:r:llzrncorrs ltetitions, if any pending in this writ pctition

¶42

shall stancl closcrl. No costs

¶43

SD/. ASSIS //TRUE COPYII T.TIT',#tis,.RiH / To s CTION OFFICER Telangana 2.1. The State prl Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, of The Chief C J- The District Collector 4. ommissionYadader Land n - AdministBhon giri rationDistrictTelan gana State at Hyderabad. 7.65. One ThThe Tahsile RevenuCC todar, SRI e DivisioBhonRAP OLU BHASgtri nal OfficeDrvtsionr, BhoKAR,Ya dngiri adri AdvocateDivisi- Bhoon, Yadadri ngiri Distri _ Bhongiri District. 8 Hyde raba d lo UT] LOPUC One Two CCCCstoGPFOtoS RI RR EVENU E, High Court fortheS tate of Telangana, at 9. One G.SA TYANARAYANA YADAV CCtoS RI B.MO 10. Two CD Cop res HAN, Advocate IOPUCJ^{, Advocate} tOpUCl PSK.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1811212024

ORDER

WP.No.24517 o12023

1 tl S T4 16
t
:)
n
a-) B 6 i t El 206 o
A
* *
-OesPATC H9O

¶52

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶53

Rekala Ramdas v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rekala Ramdas v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Murali Mukund, Vs M. Haritha

Kheda Narsimha Chary Vs The State of Telangana

Kannekanti Rajya Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Bonam Vijaya Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

M. Surender Goud Vs The Special Tribunal

Jetti Bhadramma Vs The State of Telangana