Dismissed
Bonam Vijaya Kumar v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/35599/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 35599 0F 2024
Between:
pgl"nY.tgyg Kumar, S/o B. Deva Raju, Aged 54 years, Occ. Contractor, Ri,/o. 18-8-22415t480, Raja Narsimha Cotony,'S'ant"oitr flagrr, HyOiiibrd."''-*'" "
AND
...PET|TioNER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, tne Higrt'cJut ;;; ;" pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction, more particularly oie in ttre nit-u,ie ot writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the respondents No.2 to s authoritiei in Threatening to disposses the petitioner from the prot bearing ruo. so anJ si-ror pakka construction, with rand admeasuring 200 square yards ot 167.22 squarc Telg.rs,situated in Sy.No.2sl2, situated at syed Nagar, plt Basheerabal viir"g", Quthbultapur Mandar and Munciparity, unoei GttMb circre, rr,reoctrai-l,rr.r["iiiri District, without.issuing any norice and without folowing the due process or ravJis being illegal, arbitrary and violative of principres of natural justice under article 14, 21 and 3004 of Constitution of tndia
--7 /
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under section i5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ine Higrr court may be pleased to pending disposal of the above writ petition, to direci the Respondent Nos.2 to 5, their officials etc. not to interfere with the possession or to dispossess the Petitioner from the premises plot bearing No.s6 and 57 for pakka construction, with land admeasuring 200 square yards or 167.22 square meters, situated in sy'No.25l2, situated at syed Nagar, pet Basheerabad vifiage, duthbuflapur Mandal an_d Muncipality, under GHMC circle, Medchat-uitt<algiri Distiict, Telangana State
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent NO.5: SRI V. NARASTMHA GOUD SC FOR HMDA
The Court made the following: ORDER
REDDY
SRI JUSTICEc.v.
THE HO
WRIT PETITIONNO.35s99oF 2024
ORDER
karned counselappearingfor thepetitionerseeks permission ofthis Courtto withdrawthe petition'
Miscellaneouspetitiorrs,if anr. perrding in this writ petition
shall standdismissed'
SD/-K. AMMAJI
ASSI GISTRAR
I
//TRUE COPY//
SE OFFICER
To,
BS
HIGH COURT
DATED:18 11212024
ORDER
WP.No.35599 of 2024
t1E S IA
3 12 FEB 2[25 o
,b
PATC
1 /,fr ,(u //fi,
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
B. Nagi Kumar
State of Telangana
District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Markalgiri Revenue Division
Tahsildar, Quthbullahapur Mandal
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
K. Ammaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court