Writ petition seeking implementation of a civil judgment and decree through the registration authorities. Counsel stated the cause did not survive due to efflux of time; the court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s5 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 21974 OF 2014
Between:
Alakanti Bharatamma, Wo.A.Narasimha, Aged 60years, Occ Household, R/o.H. No.10-443/2, Sathi Reddy Colony, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of [/andamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in rejectingthe petitioners representation dated 111A912012 by order dated 1210912012 for implementationof thejudgment and decree dated 1110712012 in OS No43 of 2011 on the file of the Special Sessions Judge-Cum- Additional District and sessronsJudge, at L.B.Nagar Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary anduncon stitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent for implementationof the judgmentand decree dated 1110712012 in OS No. 43 of 2011 on thefile of the Special Sessions Judge-Cum- Additional District and sessions Judge, atL.B.Nagar Ranga Reddy District
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N. KRISHNA SUMANTH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITIONNo.21974 OF201.4
ORDER:
Today when the matterhas beentaken up for hearing, learned counsel for thepetitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause inthe writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and thematter has become has infructuous.
2 Recording the above submission,this Writ Petition is disnr issed as infructuous.
closed. No order as tocosts.
SD/. V. KAVITHA ASSISTAN REGI R
,TRUE COPY// SE OFFICER
To,
BIM LS 1,,,'
HIGH COURT
DATED:0710812024
1i{E S T4
q 12 DEt :zrllz4 f-
)i
* l:l'
.,.),5'S5,,'11,,
ORDIER
WP.No.21974 of2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
e ,/ ,t iT/*to
Alakanti Bharatamma
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Stamps and Registration)
The District Registrar, Stamps and Registration Department, Ranga Reddy District
The Sub-Registrar, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
