This three-paragraph order dismisses Writ Petition No. 4248 of 2011 as infructuous because the cause of action no longer survives due to the efflux of time, with 'No order as to costs'.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l
a
i.li.l ti HrcH couRT FoR THE srA,TE'oF ' rl TELANGANAT l [325s I ATHYDERABAD Ii (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND ANDjTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:4248 OF 2011 I i
Between:
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the refusal on the part Respondent No.3 in registering the Cancellation of Noting of Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deeds daled 19.02.201 1 and insisting for payment of registration fee at 0.5% on the loan amount is arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Article 14, 19(1) (g), 21 and under Article 300 A of the Constitution of lndia apart from being in
./
,/
violation of th€ statutory provisions of the Registration Act (A.p Amendment) i.e., Rule ll (Vll) of Appendix B, table of fees .under Section 78 of the lndian Registration Act,'1 907, G.O.lVs.No. 757, Rev (REGN.l) dated 18_12-200.1 and consequently clirect the Respondent No.3 tci regjister the cancellation of Noting of Memorandum rtf Deposit of Tifle Deeds b!tollecting Registration Fee of Rs.10Ol.
LA. NO: 1OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 5243 OF 2011)
Petition rnder Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil:d ;6 5rpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Rest,ondent No.3 to receive cancellation of Noting of lvemorandum of Deposit of ritle Deeds dated 19.02.2011 by collecting Registration Fee of Rs.1 001, pending disposal of the above Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. CHANDRASEN REDDy
Counsel for ther Respondent Nos. 1to3: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRt ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.4248 OF 2011
ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter has become has infructuous.
closed. No order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTBTR sEcroN &io.*
III
To,
'l . One CC to SRI B. CHANDRASEN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
BM MP w
I
I t
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610812024
c R ,I!tE S 14 r4.
tC
(1,(
i-
1 5 0[r 2021
l-i li
4'.
{ c€.s -l
ctrEc
ORDER
WP.No.4248 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
+"{u\ ffi,
P. Shravan Kumar Reddy
Sarojini Devi P.
Jayashree G
M/s. J.S. Contractors & Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Government of Andhra Pradesh
State Bank of Hyderabad
N.V.Shravhan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
