Murtuja Khan v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a writ petition challenging inaction against a tea stall and pan shop encroaching on a public road. The court held that since the authorities had already demolished the tea stall on road, the petitioner's grievance was redressed, rendering no further orders necessary.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed as the petitioner's grievance regarding the tea stall was redressed by its demolition.
What the court decided
[3166 ]
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA . AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) tl
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ]WENTY FOUR l'ir
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 21066 OF 2024
Between:
lt4urtuja Khan, S/o: Khaisar Baba, aged'about 33years, Occ. Chartered Accountant Fl/o H. No 6-3-13318.17,2nd Floor, Barkath Residential Complex, Balanagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND I
- 1 State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, MA and UD Dept., Secretariat Buildings at Hyderabad-
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether notice to an unofficial respondent is necessary when the authorities have already demolished the encroached stall.
Whether the complaint regarding obstruction caused by a tea stall has been adequately addressed by the respondent authorities.
Whether the petition regarding a pan shop requires adjudication when it is allegedly run from inside premises.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Iturtuja Khan
- respondent
State of Telangana
- respondent
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
- respondent
New Asha Pan Palace
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/21066/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court