Disposed

Anumula Yadaiah v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (Tsrtc)

Telangana HC18 Mar 2024WP/1999/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged withdrawal of RTC bus services declaring it illegal and arbitrary. Court found services had already been restored by virtue of a prior interim order and disposed of the petition without further orders.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of without requiring any further relief as the subject services were already restored under a prior interim order.

Anumula Yadaiah Vs The Telangana State Road… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

wRlT PETITION NO: 1999 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Anumula Yadaiah, S/o: Somulu, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Marepally, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana State

¶9

,..PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (TSRTC), Head Office Bus Bhavan, lt4ushirabad, Hyderabad Rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director

¶12

The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Telangana Stale

¶13

3 The Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region, TSRTC, Nalgonda District. Telangana State

¶14

4 The Depot Manager, Nalgonda Bus Depot, TSRTC, Nalgonda District, Telangana State

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petilion under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying thal in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction, or any other appropriate Order one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents withdrawing the RTC Bus services route from Nalgonda to Haliya lvlandal via Kangal, Marepally. Venkatapur, Yacharam, since 2022, which was running since 30 years, as rllegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural^justice and consequently direct the Respondents to restore the RTC Bus services route from Nalgonda to Haliya Mandal via Kangal, Marepally, Venkatapur, Yacharam.

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto direct} the Respondents to restore the^{RTC Bus services. route from Nalgondato Haliya} Mandal via Kangal, Marepally,^{Venkatapur, Yacharam,pending disposal of the} main Writ Petition.

¶19

lA No: 2 oF 2624

¶20

tsetween:

¶21

The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation^{(TSRTC),He^ad Office Bus} Bhavan, Mushirabad, Hyderabad Rep by^{its Vice Chairman and Managing} Director

¶22

The District Collector, Nalgonda District,^{TelanganaState}

¶23

The Regional Manager, Nalgonda^{Region,TSRTC, NalgondaDistrict,} Telangana State

¶24

The Depot Manager, Nalgonda Bus Depot,^{TSRTC, NalgondaDistrict,} Telangana State

¶25

...RESPONDENTS/VACATE PETITIONERS

¶26

ANO

¶27

Anumula Yadaiah, S/o: Somulu, Aged about^{35 years, Occ.Agriculture,} F/o Marepally, Anumula^{lVandal,Nalgonda District,TelanganaState}

¶28

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petrtion. lhe^{High Court may be pleased to} vacate the interim order dl.2g.O1 .2024^{passedin WP No.1999 of 2024.}

¶30

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M A K MUKHEED

¶31

Counsel for the Respondents: GADDAM SRINIVAS^{(SC FOR TSRTC)}

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

4 T

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶35

ORDER:

¶36

WRIT PETITIONNo .1999 0F. 2024

¶37

The present writ petition filed by the petitioner for following relier

¶38

"....to issue Writ Order appropri o re order on e,^';"o::::; ;'.Ti_;:X M:y?AMyS declains the action of the Respondents ulhdrauing thc RTC grs seri_rrbes ;;;;;;; Natg.onda to Haliya Mandal "*;;;;";;;::il Venkotapur yacharam since 2O22 _hi"h r";;;; ',1".. :,^{gears as inegat arbitrary} ""o"iiii'""'lt p,rinctples of natural justbe and consequentlg d.:ireit the Responrlents to restore the RTC Bus seruices route from Nalqonda to Haliya Mandal "1"- i"i, other Marepallg venkatapur order or orders...." yacharam ond. po""- "iJh

¶39

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the interim order passed by this Court on 29.01.2024, respondents restored the RTC services from Nalgonda to Haliya Mandal via Kangal Marepally Venkatapur Yacharam.

¶40

Recording the said submission, the present writ petition is disposed of, as no further orders are required to be passed.

¶41

¶42

4 AccordinglY,^{this writ Petitionis disPosed of'} No

¶43

order^{as to costs'}

¶44

As a^{sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions' if any'}

¶45

SDI.^V.KAVITHA pending^{in the Writ Petitionshall stand closed'} ASSTSTANT^REGIST

¶46

I'TRUE^COPY'I

¶47

SECTION^OFFICER

¶48

To, ,+i,""$%"-?3;;X,11#t#'i,tilfl 3j!"3?i;JJ:J8l'1'"il?-":1i,s??1

¶49

?ili[ffi:i"^1,:$;ili',1lLft^{,?'a'i!l;l:1"#+tlilli?'District'} Nr''gono'^{Bus Depot' rsRrc' Narsonda District'} I f[{;:l:g"': urSt u 3. li:t€in t:A^{x,,.Ill::ib6ix? ?taf"d} "r 7. Two^{CD CoPies} TJ ",l KKS \V

I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1810312024

ORDER

WP.No.1999 of 2024

t1 r\s. S rAa s
.l?
L) 0 6 t{N 2021 )
1t
* +
D,!5,:,,i1f,d

¶56

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶57

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶58

ul
}
(t\ a\ .h

Anumula Yadaiah v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (Tsrtc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anumula Yadaiah v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (Tsrtc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vemula Upender Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Numineral Solutions Private Limited, Vs The State of Telangana

Kiran Potteries Workers Union, Vs Authorized Officer

Padithala Rajeshwar Rao Vs Chief General Manager, ( Project and Rac )

M/s. Nchem Sciences Vs The State of Telangana

Ch. Kishore Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana