Writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC challenging a Land Acquisition notice and seeking reference to Civil Court was dismissed for non-prosecution/default as petitioners were absent on hearing dates despite listing.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.19144 OF 2008
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Unit-|, ORR, HUDA, Tarnaka, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the impugned notice issued by the respondent herein vide No.LA/Unit/9O/9119212005 dated 04.08.2008 and to set aside and consequently direct the respondent to refer the award vide proceedings dated No.LA/Unitll90l2}05, LA/Unitl/91/2005, and LAlUnit-119212O05 all dated 04.07.20O7 with respect to the extenl of Ac.9.39 gts in SY.No.24,27 and 28 of Raikunta village, Shamshabad mandal, Ranga Reddy District may be referred to a Civil Court under section 1B of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for appropriate determination of compensation as claimed through application dated 02.07.2008.
!.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 249 60 0F 2008)
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition by fixing an early date of hearing.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI B. CHANDRASEN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION SMT. D. MADHAVI
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.19144 of 2008 ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2OOg. On 2O.O2.2O24, when the matter wss saIsd, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, ald therefore ttre matter was directed to be listed on 12.03.2024 under the caption "for Dismissal". On I2.O3.2O24, when the matter was called, learned counsel for the petitioners requested time and the matter was directed to be listed today. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
3 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECT]ON OFFICER
To,
MP s C.I P
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210412024
1-::--:: S TA I
o
( s
+
>
I
3 1 !1 Y 202{ a t\jtll
.<br>-6
t
f' AT C (-o
ORDER
WP.No.19144 of 2008
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTION FOR NON-PROSECUTTON/DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
W
Sri Rajender Kumar Jain and Anr.
The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), ORR, HUDA, Tarnaka, Hyderabad
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
