Writ petition concerning alleged panchayat construction on the petitioner's land was called twice with no representation from the petitioner's counsel; the High Court dismissed it for non-prosecution/default, closing pending miscellaneous applications and making no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAYOF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRlT PETITION NO: 30692OF 2015
Between:
Syed Sharfuddin Ahmed, S/o LateSyedMohiuddin Ahmed,Aged about45 y6ars, Occupation Agriculture, R/o Turkala MohamadapurVillage, Shankarampet( R) Mandal, MedakDistrict-502117
...PETITIONER
AND
The Dist Collector, Medak District,At Sangareddy-502001
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oI lheConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Directionparticularlyone in the nature of IMANDAMUS declaringthe actions of the 1st respondenthereinin trying to construct building forthe panchayathand laying 15' road in the open land in the houseproperty bearingNo. 4-52. comprisingabout Ac 04-00 gts situated at Turkala MohamadapurVillage,Shankarampet (R) Mandal,Medak District, without following dueprocess of law as illegal, arbitrary,unreasonable and opposed toprovisions of Rightto fair compensation and transparencyin land acquisition, rehabilitation andresettlementAct, 2013, and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A ofthe constitutionof India and issue a consequential
direction to the respondents herein not to dispossess thepetitioner and hisfamily members from the said land without following dueprocess of law.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO:39637 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Courlmay be pleased to issue a direction to the respondents herein not to dispossess thepetitionerand his family members from the open land rn the houseproperty bearingNo. 4-52 comprising about Ac 04-00 gts situated atTurkalaN4ohamadapur Village, Shankarampet(R) Mandal, ttiledak Districtpending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO:45 443 0F2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto rectify the cause title of the Writ Petition and theWPMP No. 39637of 2015, in the description of 1st respondent by deleting thewords "Rep by its Sarpanch,T. Sidda Goud, S/o T. Linga Goud A/a:40years, Occ: Business," and adding the words" represented by itspanchayat secretary".
l.A. NO:3 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 45520 OF 2015)
Between:
Syed Sharfuddin Ahmed, S/o Late Syedlvlohiuddin Ahmed, Aged about 45 years, Occupation Agriculture, Rl/o Turkala lvlohamadapur Village, Shankarampet ( R) l\rlandal, lvledak District-502117
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
...PROPOSED PARTY/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section151 cPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed insupportof the petition, the High court may be pleasedto permit the Petitioner to add theproposed party/ respondent as RespondentNo. 6 to the Writ Petrtion andWPMP NO. 39637 of 2015.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI M.M.ALl (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1: SRIG.NARENDER REDDY' SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2, 4 & 5: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ
Counsel for the RespondentNo.3: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:ORDER
I
i=
//
,/
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.3O692 of 2O15
ORDER:
This petition is comingfor hearing since 2015' On 11.03.2024, when thematter was called, there was no representation onbehalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matterwas directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal'.Even today,when the matter is called, there is norepresentation on behall of the petitioner. It seems thatthe petitioner is not interestedto prosecute this case.
SD/. V.HARIPRASAD ASSISTANTIREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// SECT16N OFFICER
R
,]
-a-'-
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0110412024
//
. i i';'i 2i?{
I
ORDER
WP.No.30692 of2015
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULT,
WITHOUT COSTS
g
T
W
Syed Sharfuddin Ahmed
The Grampanchayath, Turkala Mohamadapur Village
Prl. Secretary to State of Telangana, Panchayat Raj Department
The District Collector, Medak District
District Panchayath Officer, Medak District
Mandal Development Officer, Shankarampet (R) Mandal
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
