Katta Veakat Reddy v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged the forced laying of a road on his agricultural land via writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus. The Court observed that authorities had stopped the road laying. It directed respondents not to interfere with possession without due process, requiring adherence to the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if acquisition is sought.
What did the court decide?
Directing respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property without following due process of law; requiring compliance with the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if