The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by fertilizer dealers challenging state restrictions on their business area, as the writ petition was no longer maintainable.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HtGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THETENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 18933 OF 2018
Between :
..,..PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriateWrit, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct theRespondents to act in accordance with Iaw by not insisting the Petitioners to do thebusiness of wholesale dealers in fertilizers in pursuance to the license issued tothem by the DistrictAgriculture officer in the District of Khammam onlyunder the Provisionsof Fertilizer(control) Order,'1985 and to issue a consequentlaldirectionto the Respondentsnot to
\
interfere with the business of the Petitioners as wholesale dealers of Fertilizersby insisting on them to do the business in the District of Khammam only.
LA.NO:1 OF 2018
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the business of the Petitionersas wholesale dealers of Fertilizers by insisting on them to do the business in the existing District of Khammam only without allowing them to do the business in the entire State of Telangana,pending disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR AGRICULTURE
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.18933 OF 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the wriL pctilion does nol survive. In view of the same, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shail be no order as to costs.
pending, shall stand closed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /iTRUE COPY// \ t)
SECTION OFFICER
To
SA LS
@A
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010912024
ORDER
WP.No.18933 of 2018
'Hr
tHE STa
/.2 ( /{i ./
li:<
'i
\
(-) 2 0 lrllU 293 ):
(: /1
?+
'...*\ 3^ '- ^ -cr'tr.s._),
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUTCOSTS.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Balakrishna Distributing Company, Rep. by Golla Murali Krishna
M/s. Sri Manikanta Traders, Rep. by Pullakhandam Nagender Rao
State of Telangana
The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Government of Telangana
The Addl. Director of Agriculture, Government of Telangana
The District Agriculture Officer, Khammam
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
