Petitioner sought to declare certain revenue proceedings illegal. The court found the cause wandered no longer survived for adjudication and the writ petition had become infructuous upon accepting the petitioner's submission.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 167 32 0F 2024
Between:
Itzlohammed_ You.nus Khan,, S/o: [Vohammed Abdul Raheem Khan, aged 61 yeai's P..,/o l(ina l(othi. Ahirjs., Hy,leiabaC r.epresuniej Oy nls CCpe-FciCer, y/: l;r,!9lgr"k Developers, thlriugh iii-rr,lrirsirs"F"rtner, y.Sai Sanrhosh r/o:y.Koreswara Rao, aqed 29 years Ryo FlaaN6 K ZOz, X gloal(, Rai;b; Vistas. [,4oosapet, Balanalar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or Writs, order or Direction, decraring the action of 2nd Respondent in not passing any interim order in the interrocutory apprication fired by the petitioner in Appear No. D|142112024 inspite of the matter being heard on re 1 0.6.2024 as iilegar and arbitrary.
Or In The Alternative
lssue a Writ of lVlandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the proceedings initiated by 3rd Respondent tn Proc. No.
Bt22gt2o24daled2|7.5'2024underSection6ofT.S'LandEncroachmentACt, 1905, as illegal,arbi:rary, without .lurisdiction and contrarytc law' Award costs
lA NO:1 oF 2024
Petition underIlection151 cPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled in s;upport of the petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto grant interim stay ofoper;rticnof the order passedby the :ird Respondent dated 27.5.2024 inpr6c,.l,Jo.Bl22gt2o24passedunderSection6of T-S Land EncroachmentAct, 1905, till the disposal of the appeal filed by the petitioner before the 2nd ResPondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY
Counsel for theF.espondents:GPFOR REVENUE
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. L 6732 of 2O24
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and the u,rit petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs
SDi. L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSIS T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
TION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611112024
ORDER
.<br>:))+.
:l
_) 20 rtB zffi
.:,
\t..
WP.No.16732of 2024
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOIJS
WTTHOUTCOSTS.
/lo
i77'-ttr
Itzlohammed Younus Khan
Government of Telangana
Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division
Collector and Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal
C. V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
