In a petition under Article 226 challenging an endorsement regarding patta restoration, the petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
-1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Originat Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 8529 OF 2023
Between:
Maramraju Appa Rao, S/o. Yadaigiri Rao, aged about 63years, Occ ; Agriculture, Rl/o. Abbaipalem Village, Maripeda Mandal, Mahabubabad District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondentin issuingthe impugned endorsement daled 16t1212022 inproceedings No. Bl2O34l2O22in not restorin! the name of thepetitioner aspattadar of the land in Sy.No. 405, admeasuring Ac.3-00 situated at Abbaipalem village, Maripeda Mandal, MahabubabadDistrict
1
from the illegal entries of the names respondents 4 and 5, though it is the petitioner who is the original pattadar of the above rand and further though there are no proceedings effecting transfer of the patta of the above land from the name of the petitioner tc, the names of the respondents, as iflegar, unraMur, contrary to law and consequentry direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to restore the patta of the above land in the name of the petitioner in the Dharani portal from the names of the respondents 4 and 5.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2023
Petition Under Section 15 r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in supcort of the petition, the High court may be preased to issue interim order directing the 3rd respondent not to give effect to the implementation of the narnes of the 4th and 5th respondents as pattadar in the ROR of the land in Sy. \o. 405, admeasuring Ac.3_00 situated Abbaipalem village, Maripeda Mandar, Mahabubabad District, pending disposar of main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.DAMODAR REDDy
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : AGp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : -
Counsel for the implead Respondent No.6 : SRI NARENDAR JALLI
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.8529 OF 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition
No order as to costs
shall stand dismissed
SD/.A.V.S.PR AD ASSISTANT REGI AR //TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP
s
HIGH COURT
DATED:0511112024
/.:il .., : I.4 i rj o
(.'
1
r; .U &l
1t il
,;'
,;,,
ORDER
WP.No.8529 of 2023
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
@)q'o
1o
Maramraju Appa Rao
The State of Telangana
The Collector, Mahabubabad
The Tahsildar, Maripeda Mandal
Boda Surya
Boda Panthulu
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
