Writ petition challenging stay orders granting ownership certificates quashed as infructuous due to non-survival of the cause for adjudication.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3296 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITTON NO:1 3999 0F 2023
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI tocall for the records pertainingto the orders dated 30-05-2023 in Appeal CaseNo.B2l65212023passedby the respondent No.2 granting stay orders against theorders dated 29-08-2022in Ol2513l2O2Opassed by the respondentNo.3 in issuing ownership certificate under sec.ge-e(Z) of A.P.(TA) Tenancy andAgricultural Lands Act 1950 in respect of lands covered by Sy. Nos.236,254 and255 admeasuringAc'O.11.4 gts., Ac.O.9.3 gts., and Ac.0.10.8 gts., respectively situated at lbrahimbagh village, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad District,. T.S.,issued infavour of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, unjust contrary to theprovisions of the Tenancy Act and Rules made there under and againstthe principles of naturaljusticeand contrary to Art.19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution oflndia and consequently QUASH there on i.e., the impugned orderpassed by the 2nd respondent in B2l 6521 2023 dated 30-05-2023.
7
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleased to SUSPEND the orders dated 30-05-2023 in 82165212023passed by, the respondent No.2,pending disposal of writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SRINIVASA MURTHY CHEEDELLA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI M.V.PRATAP KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.13999 OF 2o23
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up forhearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted thatthe cause in the writ petitiondoes not survive for adjudication and hence,the writpetitionhas become infructuous.
In view of the said submission,the WritPetition is dismissed
as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneouspetitions, if any,pending shallstand closed.
SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
-I
ASSISTANT REGIPTRAR ,
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
/
To,
BSR BS
@i
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1311212024
td?'
<br><br>l? , <br>I
30 sLt 2uii :
()
\ v^ *
E s PAT
ORDER
WP.No.13999 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
2{\p
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G.Padma Latha and others
The State of Telangana
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
