C. Bharathi v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court closed writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC seeking directions for mutation, holding cause did not survive due to a prior order.
What did the court decide?
Closed Writ Petition without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 I
<br>
?"j.,,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: s652 0F 2024
Between:
t.gnarathi, W/o Late C. Laxma Reddy, aged about 70 years, R/o H. No.-1072, Chittapuram (V), Valigonda [vlandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
t. gnarathi
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
Chief Commissioner of Land Administration
- respondent
District Collector
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/5652/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court