Petitioner challenged non-consideration of representation for ex-gratia compensation for acquired land. Counsel submitted cause of action no longer survives. Court dismissed writ petition as infructuous with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e61
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecialOriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE C'V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITIONNO:12 392 0F 2014
Between:
Devaraiu JayaLakshmi Devi, Wo .SrinivasaRao' Aqed 55 years'occ Househotd,nyo f naib#rfIViiird",ftl jtnarraoMandal, KErimnagar District'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court maybe pleased to issuea writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WR|ToFMANDAMUsdeclaringtheactionof2ndrespondentinnotconsidering thepetitioners claimfor payment of compensationiexgratiapayabl'e for the land of Ac. 10.00guntas in Survey No- 893 and further extent of Ac 10'03 guntasin surveyNo-Sg4ofTadicherlaVillageinMalharraoMandalofKarimnagarDistrict' being acquiredfor 4th respondent' as illegal'irregular'irrational' violativeof provisions of LandAcquisition Act' '1894'and offendsarticles 14 and 21 ol constitutionof lndia and consequenfly direct the 2nd respondent to decidethe
petitioners representation dated 06.02.20'14 under the provisrons of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
l.A. NO: 1OF 20 14tWPMP. NO: 15568 OF 20't4l
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to decide the petitioner's representation dated 06.02.2014 under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to pay compensation to any third parties, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y.RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
The Court made the following: ORDER
":7
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI(ARREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.12392 of 2Ol4
ORDER:
Sri Y.Rama Rao, learned counsel forthe petitionerhas fairly submits that the cause in thewrit petition does not survive for adjudication and the reliefsought in the writ petition has become infructuous.
dismissed as infructuous. Nocosts.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed
SD/. P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
/TTRUECOPY/'
SEC N OFFICER
To,
a-
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1210912024
qt.i-
f.
i-)
^{)
1t >
?ri t'l Llr ',)=
' ,/
*
:::,.:'-.yr
ORDER
WP.No.12392 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
br*
b
lLl-
[,1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survives for adjudication given the submission that relief has become infructuous?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Devaraiu Jaya Lakshmi Devi
State of Andhra Pradesh
Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer
Tahsildar, Malharrao Mandal
Chairman, Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited
Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
