Dismissed
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan v. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staffs Employees Union of Ap
Telangana HCSA/872/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
under Section 100 of c.p.c against the…
What the court decided
AI extract
under Section 100 of c.p.c against the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13215 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
SECOND APP EAL NO: 872OF 2O1o
second Appeal under Section 100 of c.p.c against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.06.2010 made in A.S.No. 4Bt ot 2oos on the file of thL court of the Xl Additional Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Bharatiya vidya Bhavan, Hyderabad Kendra rep by its Registrar o/o.King Koti, Hyderabad.
...appellant
AND
..Respondents
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2O10(SAMP. NO: 1 962 0F 20.t0)
Petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 R/w Section.i5i CpC praying that in the circumstances steted in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ir,JHigl., court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the respondents-2 and 3 from picketing demonstrating, gheroaing, or preventing the ingress and egress of the petitioner's vehicles, staff, teachers, students, employees and visitors from entering into the petitioner's premises and holding meeting, demonslrations, slogans, shouting within a distance of 500 Mts from the entrancl of the petitioner's premises.
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl. VTVEK JAtN
Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: Sri N HARI PRASAD
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HONOURABLEDR.JUSTICEG. RADHA RANI
SECOND APPEALNo.872 of 2010
JUDGMENT:
Leamed counsel forthe appellant reported that the respondent No'l - Bharatiya VidyaBhavans Staff EmployeesUnionis not functionirrgat present.As such, the cause of actionwould not surviveand soughtpermissionof this Court for
withdrawal of the Second Appealwith a liberty to file as and whennecessary.
libcrty to the appetlant to agitalethe mattcras and when required'
I'lo order as to costs
As a sequel, tniscellaneousapplications pending in this appeal if any, shall
stand closed
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- CH. VENKATESW LU DEPUW REGIS RAR
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SP/JK
w
j
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 110112024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.872 of 2010
e 1HE SI4
( o
1(
J G
,:)
0 4 itAR 2024
o
D PTlTCH gg
SECOND APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
6rcpf..l w ;[J'4
Bharatiya vidya Bhavan, Hyderabad Kendra
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staff Employees Union of Ap
M.lr/ukesh
B.R.Jithender
G. RADHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court