Second appeal against a decree reversing the trial court's judgment; dismissed for default as neither appellant nor counsel appeared despite being posted under caption for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I il
IN THE HIGHCOURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD
FRIDAY, THETWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENW FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICEG. RADHA RANI
SECOND APPEALNO: 433 OF 2011
Second'AppealfiledunderSectionl00ofCivilProcedureCodeaggrieved uy ttre Juagmeni inaoecieedated ot.o2.2ol ,t passedin AS No.84 of 2006 on the nL-oi o" Lourtof tne rrr eaJitionalDistrictJudge(FTc), Ranga ReddyDistrict pr"t"ir"J"srinst the .ruagmenianag""t::.9"i"918'03'zE6passed in oS No'38 ;ii969 o" ih. fileof the piin.iparJunior civil Judge, Ranga Reddv at Hvderabad'
Between:
B. Gangaiah,S/o. Mallaiah, Business R/o 15-4-435/3' lsman Shahi' Gowliguda'
.,.APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
AND
V. Pratap Reddy ,S/o V. Narsimha Reddy,Occ:BusinessRl/o' H'M'T'Nagar' istrict' Ranga ReddYD
'..RES'.NDENT',APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
I.A. N :1OF2O1 SAMP. NO: 092 0F 2011
PetitionunderSectionlslcPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiled in "rpportoi tt'. p"iition,tt'e HionCourt may be pleased to suspend the Judgment,nJb!"r".Jf-e"rn"alll .Adj6itbnalDistrict Judge (FTC), Ranga Reddydistrict at i.s-.N-"g", dated 01.02.20.t1made in AS.No.8412006 pending disposal oftheabove SA
GounselfortheAppellant:SRt V' TULASI REDDY il;;;iiortne nliponaent:SRI v' RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
THE COURTMADE THE FOLLOWTNG: ORDER
TIIE HOIYBLE DT.JUS'IICE G.RADHA RANI SECONT) APPEAL No.433 of 20lt
JUDGMENT:
This Sccond Appeal is filed by the appellant_respondent_deibndant aggrieved by the judgmenr and decree dated 01.02.2011 passed in A.S.No.g4 of 2006 on thc file of the III Additionar DistrictJudge (FTC), Ranga Reddy District, reversing the judgrne.t and decree datcri 0g.03.2006 passed in o.S.No.3g of 1999 on the [ile ofthe Principar Junior civii Judge. Ranga Reddy at Hydcrabad.
?" when the marter was takcn up for hearing on 0g. r2.2023, there was no rep'escrltation by the learned counsel fbr.the appellant. I{ence, thc matte, was directed to bc posted .rnder the ca;;tion 'rbr crismissar '. Even today, also, tircrc is ,o rc'prescntation by the rea'ned cou.sel tirr the appc ant though thc ruratler is posted under the caption 'fbr disrnissai'. rt appears that the appcllant is not evincing any interest in 1:rosecuting the matter.
J Hence, the second appeal is dismissed fcrr default. No costs
Miscellaneous petitions, if anv pending shall stand closed.
Sd,. K. SAILESHI DEPUTYREGISTRAR ,,TRUECOPY/I /-
SECTIdNOFFICER
To
iHf,'#ti#:,.."*"d#ri$i3:*hhffiqiH}ji'tr3::::-Rec'rdsranv) S.TwoCD CoPies. C\l4ltutP'
HIGH COURT DATED:I2.01.2024
IHE S 14 14:
'Jq ($('
o
o
0l tpn Zrtrzt
az
A
* ,+
{'
oEsPATCH €O
JUDGMENT SA.No.433 ot 2O11
DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
I
$
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Gangaiah
V. Pratap Reddy
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
